Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner Deny Ray J's Allegations of Orchestrating 2007 Sex Tape Release in Court Filings
LONDON, ENGLAND - OCTOBER 22: Kris Jenner and Kim Kardashian attend the "All's Fair" London Premiere at Odeon Luxe Leicester Square on October 22, 2025 in London, England.Photo Credit: Gareth Cattermole
Los Angeles Superior Court received declarations from Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner on March 10, 2026, rejecting singer Ray J's assertions that they planned and leaked a 2007 sex tape featuring Kardashian and Ray J. The tape, released commercially by adult entertainment company Vivid Entertainment in May 2007, marked a pivotal moment that launched Kardashian into global fame and contributed to the Kardashian-Jenner family's reality television empire.
In her declaration, Kardashian stated: " claim that I had a plan with my mother and others to release a sex tape, defraud the public, and file a 'fake' lawsuit against the porn company that released it to 'create buzz' is a lie." She added that she has incurred expenses combating Ray J's "lies." Jenner described the accusations as "absolutely false" and "deeply offensive and harmful," emphasizing: "As a mother, the notion that I orchestrated or produced sex tapes involving my daughter, or was in any way involved in the creation or distribution of any sex tapes, is not only entirely untrue but deeply offensive and harmful and has haunted me for decades." Both called the claims "disgusting."
Kardashian has separately argued that Ray J's statements are harming her efforts to become a lawyer, while Jenner accused him of "publicly terrorizing" her daughter. Following the filings, Ray J told TMZ: "The fact of the matter is, if you lie like that under oath, don’t you go to jail?" A hearing on Ray J's motion to dismiss occurred last week, with a ruling pending.
This case revives long-standing public speculation about the tape's origins, which some attribute to intentionally boosting Kardashian's profile. While no direct LGBTQ+ community responses or impacts are documented in coverage of this specific development, the broader context of non-consensual intimate imagery distribution has drawn attention from organizations advocating for survivors, including those in the LGBTQ+ community where revenge porn disproportionately affects transgender people and others facing digital harassment. The Kardashian-Jenner family's influence in media continues to shape discussions on celebrity privacy and exploitation narratives. Legal experts note that defamation cases involving public figures require proving actual malice, a high bar set by precedents like New York Times v. Sullivan. The dispute underscores enduring reputational stakes from early-career scandals in the entertainment industry.
Copyright EDGE Media Network. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
