Of the 225 films reviewed, 46 included at least one LGBTQ+ character, representing 20.4 percent of the total. That figure was down from 59 of 250 films, or 23.6 percent, in the previous study, and from a reported high of 28.5 percent in the 2022 film year. GLAAD describes the decline as a third consecutive year of reduced representation among the distributors it tracks.

The number of LGBTQ+ characters also decreased substantially. GLAAD counted 112 LGBTQ+ characters in the 2025 films, compared with 181 in the prior study. The organization reported that 34 of those characters, or 30 percent, were people of color, down from 36 percent previously. GLAAD said that the 2025 figure was the lowest proportion of LGBTQ+ characters of color recorded in the nine editions of the study that measured this category.

Transgender representation disappears from the sample

The report’s most pronounced finding concerns transgender representation. GLAAD counted zero transgender characters in the 225 films reviewed and zero films with transgender-inclusive characters. The organization recorded two transgender-inclusive films in each of the previous two studies and 12 in the study covering 2022 releases.

GLAAD characterized transgender inclusion in the films studied as “non-existent” and criticized both harmful portrayals and the exclusion of transgender characters and stories. The organization’s report argues that authentic representation should involve nuanced storytelling and meaningful participation by transgender people, rather than relying on stereotypes or inauthentic casting.

The absence of transgender characters is distinct from the report’s count of seven nonbinary characters. GLAAD classified those characters as nonbinary but did not identify them as transgender within the films’ narratives. The study counted characters based on what was stated or shown in the films, rather than on an actor’s real-life identity, source material, or outside reporting.

Family films remain a major gap

None of the 19 animated or family films in the study included an LGBTQ+ character. GLAAD defines the family category as animated and children’s films rated PG or below. The organization said that the complete absence of LGBTQ+ characters in this category overlooks LGBTQ+ young people and families who also watch mainstream family entertainment.

The report also found that LGBTQ+ characters remained more likely to appear in supporting or background roles than as central figures. Eighteen of the 112 characters were leads, 27 were significant supporting characters, 37 were supporting characters, and 30 were background characters. Taken together, supporting and background roles accounted for 60 percent of the characters counted.

Thirty-six of the 46 inclusive films passed the Vito Russo Test, a measure GLAAD uses to assess whether an LGBTQ+ character is identifiable, significant, and connected to the story rather than included only as a marginal device. That result means that most inclusive films in the sample met the test, although the overall number of inclusive films and characters continued to fall.

Mid-budget films and horror provide a different picture

The report does not portray every part of the film business as moving in the same direction. GLAAD identified mid-budget films and horror as areas where LGBTQ+ stories achieved notable visibility or financial performance. Among the 19 inclusive films with publicly reported budgets, 11 had production budgets between $15 million and $90 million.

GLAAD also reported that every theatrically released LGBTQ+-inclusive horror film in the study with available budget information earned more than twice its production budget at the box office. The organization highlighted films including The Parenting, Companion, and Weapons in its discussion of horror’s performance. The report’s financial analysis applies only to the films and budget information covered by its methodology; it does not establish that LGBTQ+ content alone caused a film’s commercial result.

GLAAD cited Hedda, Blue Moon, and Sorry, Baby as examples of films that placed LGBTQ+ characters prominently in their stories. It also pointed to Fairyland as a film that included two characters living with HIV, following two consecutive studies in which the organization counted no LGBTQ+ characters living with HIV.

What the findings mean for the movie business

GLAAD President and Chief Executive Officer Sarah Kate Ellis said that the industry risks losing younger audiences if studios do not invest in films featuring LGBTQ+ characters. GLAAD Senior Director of Entertainment Research and Analysis Megan Townsend similarly argued that studios cannot afford to disregard LGBTQ+ moviegoers when developing films and marketing strategies.

The report connects representation to audience demographics, citing Gallup’s finding that 23 percent of Americans under 30 identify as LGBTQ+. That statistic is presented by GLAAD as part of its business argument for inclusive storytelling, not as a direct measurement of film attendance or box-office spending by LGBTQ+ audiences.

GLAAD recommends that studios increase the number and narrative importance of LGBTQ+ characters, restore representation of LGBTQ+ people of color, include transgender people authentically, and develop LGBTQ+-inclusive animated and family films. It also calls for continued investment in theatrical releases, streaming titles, independent productions, mid-budget projects, and original stories rather than relying only on established franchises.

The study is limited to films from 10 major distributors and does not represent every LGBTQ+-inclusive film released in 2025. GLAAD noted that smaller distributors released films it considered significant, including The History of Sound, Mother Father Sister Brother, The Wedding Banquet, Plainclothes, and A Nice Indian Boy. The report therefore documents a contraction in representation within the major-distributor sample, while also acknowledging that LGBTQ+ filmmaking continues beyond the largest studios.

For LGBTQ+ audiences, the report presents a mixed picture: major-studio inclusion declined, transgender representation was absent from the sample, and family films offered no LGBTQ+ characters. At the same time, the report identifies evidence that films centering LGBTQ+ people can receive critical attention and, in selected genres and budget ranges, achieve strong commercial results. The immediate business question is whether major distributors respond to those successes with broader, more consistent investment—or continue narrowing the range of stories visible in mainstream cinema.

In an increasingly connected world, there's no shortage of hot takes and judgment. That is evident yet again in recent days in the wake of a new music video from singer Ariana Grande and the release last week of her new album, “Petal,” which reignited commentary about her thin appearance.

It also raised the question: Just because we can say anything, does that mean we should? Some saw yet more body-shaming being aimed, no surprise, at a woman in a society that constantly judges them; others said it was simply concern. Some called for respecting her privacy, while others said the influence of celebrities on young fans made it a valid topic.

Grande, 33, has faced attention and commentary throughout her career around her appearance, with the current focus being on the increasing visibility of her body’s bone structure, including her sternum and rib cage.

She has pushed back against discourse that she’s anything other than healthy, and repeatedly insisted that she doesn’t think commenting on people’s bodies is acceptable. Her representative told People magazine that she would be stepping back from public life after her current tour finishes due to the “endless, ongoing public scrutiny.”

Even in the video, a nearly seven-minute indictment of the harsh process of assessment and judgment that leads to fame and celebrity, Grande hits on the subject of being constantly sized up. “I don't need someone to save me,” she sings. “I'm not a victim.”

The way we talk in situations about body image matters because the impact can transcend a one-off comment or snap judgment about celebrities we’ll never meet, says Johanna Kandel, founder and CEO of the National Alliance for Eating Disorders.

“I would just check our intentions behind it,” Kandel said. “What is the purpose of it? ... What is the intent versus the impact of it?”

Judging famous women by appearances is nothing new

Aggressive scrutiny of people in the spotlight is nothing new, nor is the reality that women’s appearances are heavily judged — even though the past decade has brought concerted efforts to promote ideas of body acceptance at all sizes.

These days, effective weight loss-inducing medications — their use driven by celebrities — have joined the larger cultural conversation. They’re shifting the ground once again around ideas of thinness, beauty and health, with some concerned that a slew of images of noticeably skinnier famous faces could have a troubling impact on those struggling with body image issues or eating disorders.

Judgment and criticism on one side, coupled with calls to stop saying anything about Grande’s body on the other, can make nuanced conversations about beauty and health difficult, says Allison Butler, a senior lecturer in communication at University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

“We limit both the complexity of the folks that we are directing our attention to, as well as our own complex understandings of ourselves,” said Butler, author of “The Judgment of Gender: How Women are Centered and Silenced in Pop Culture.”

Fundamentally, many experts say, it's no one's place to pass judgment on someone's body, celebrity or otherwise.

“With celebrities, I encourage people to resist the urge to speculate altogether. Public conversations about celebrity bodies often reinforce the idea that our bodies are open for public discussion, and that’s a message young people are listening to,” Rachel Goldman, a psychologist and clinical assistant professor at NYU's Grossman School of Medicine, said via email.

“We also have to remember that comments about someone’s appearance (whether they’re meant as compliments or criticisms) can reinforce the idea that our value is tied to how we look,” she said.

That doesn't mean ignoring the reality that people struggle with disordered eating in varied ways. Kandel references her own experience.

“When I was first approached about my eating disorder, it was (from) a place of concern, but it was like, ”You look like Skeletor,'" she said, and not “'Hey, what's going on? I'm really worried about you.'”

To Kandel, ignoring such issues is less effective than thinking hard about how we address them. “It can’t be a conversation that we evade,” she said, “but it’s more of bringing it to the curiosity and the compassion as opposed to the criticism.”

It can be difficult to talk to children about these issues

For parents talking with children, Goldman suggests shifting the conversation away from judging bodies to talking about the messages society is sending. Also crucial: reminding them that appearance isn't an indicator of health and well-being.

“Ultimately, we want young people to understand that their body is just one part of who they are. Their worth isn’t determined by their size or shape, and neither is anyone else’s,” she said.

That's what Jennifer Hill tries to do. The 56-year-old pediatric nurse from Broomall, Pennsylvania, says her 16-year-old daughter, a cheerleader and runner, hates when she gets comments on her body.

“I will talk to her and if someone has mentioned something to her, I’m like, ‘You know what? Everybody’s different, everybody’s born different, their bodies are created different,’” Hill said.

Though she says things have improved since her youth in the 1980s, when she recalls people being unafraid to offer the harshest comments, she still sees it as a struggle. Plus, she said, social media has added pressure. She also sees it in her work life, where she has worked with young people with emotional struggles or eating disorders. Her advice: Listen.

“You don’t want to come out and say, ‘You know, you’re really overweight,’” she said. “You have to tread lightly.”

It's about guiding them and their thinking, not just telling them what to do, Hill said. “Communication is key ... I think having open conversation and letting them do a lot of the talking and not so much you.”

As for Grande, she spoke to fans in recent days, making a statement from the stage Monday night that she read from her phone. She said she knows fans are worried that “negativity was ruining things” for her, but said the opposite is true.

“Multiple things can be true at the same time. Boundaries need to be set," she said. “Human beings can need a break sometimes. And also, this can be and will continue to be the greatest experience of my professional and creative life.”

Her fans — many of them young women — erupted in cheers.

NBC announced the change on Tuesday, Aug. 4, describing the upcoming installment as The Voice: Celebrity, a special season built around celebrity contestants rather than undiscovered singers.

The network said the season will include actors, musicians, influencers, athletes, comedians and reality television personalities competing through the show’s familiar format.

The celebrity contestants have not yet been announced.

Palmer confirmed the hosting role in a social-media video released alongside NBC and The Voice accounts, saying, “That’s right, it’s true. I am hosting The Voice. I’ll see you guys there!”

The announcement makes Palmer the new on-camera guide for a substantially revised version of the program, although NBC has not announced the exact premiere date for her season.

Carson Daly Will Remain Involved

Daly will not host the celebrity edition, but NBC said he will continue with Season 31 as a producer.

Variety also reported that Daly is a producer on The Voice: Celebrity, distinguishing the hosting change from a complete departure from the franchise.

Daly has been associated with the U.S. version of The Voice since its launch in 2011 and has hosted the program through its first 30 seasons.

NBC’s announcement does not state that Daly has permanently left the franchise or that Palmer will host every future season.

For the regular edition of The Voice, Daly remains the host when Season 30 begins this fall.

A Celebrity Contestant Format

The Voice: Celebrity will retain key elements of the established competition, including Blind Auditions and Battles, while placing recognizable public figures in the contestant roles.

NBC described additional features designed to follow the participants away from the main stage.

Variety reported that “Voice Boot Camp” will show celebrities preparing for their Blind Auditions, while a “VIP Room” will feature contestants watching their fellow performers.

Another segment, called the “Workroom,” will follow the participants as they strategize, rehearse and prepare for the Battles.

The format is being promoted as the first celebrity edition of The Voice anywhere in the world.

The season’s stated objective is to crown the first The Voice celebrity champion.

Coaches for Season 31

Palmer will be joined by Joe Jonas, Queen Latifah and Riley Green, who will serve as the season’s coaches.

Season 31 will mark Jonas’ debut as a coach on the U.S. version of The Voice.

Jonas has previously participated in the wider franchise as a coach on the Australian version of The Voice in 2018.

His younger brother, Nick Jonas, previously served as a coach on the U.S. program during Seasons 18 and 20.

Latifah and Green will move directly from their Season 30 coaching debuts into the celebrity edition.

The regular Season 30 coaching panel also includes Kelly Clarkson and Adam Levine, but NBC’s announcement lists Jonas, Latifah and Green as the coaches for The Voice: Celebrity.

Palmer’s NBC Hosting Background

Palmer already hosts NBC’s Password, giving her experience leading a network competition and game-show format before taking on The Voice.

NBC identifies Palmer as an Emmy-winning host, actress, singer, songwriter and producer.

The network said Palmer became the first Black woman to be nominated for and win the Emmy for Outstanding Host for a Game Show for her work on Password in 2023.

She has also hosted the podcast Baby, This Is Keke Palmer since 2022 and served as a guest mentor on American Idol in 2026.

NBC characterized Palmer’s “creative range, bold authenticity, humor and heart” as qualities suited to the special season and said she would connect viewers with the competition.

Scheduling and Production

The Voice: Celebrity is scheduled to air on NBC in 2027, but the network has not released a specific premiere date.

NBC said production has begun on the special season.

The regular Season 30 of The Voice is scheduled to premiere Monday, Sept. 21, at 8 p.m. Eastern Time on NBC, with episodes available to stream the following day on Peacock.

The Voice: Celebrity is produced by MGM Alternative, Warner Horizon Unscripted Television and ITV Studios The Voice USA, Inc.

The production team includes The Voice creator John de Mol, Mark Burnett, Audrey Morrissey, Amanda Zucker, Kyra Thompson, Adam H. Sher and Barry Poznick, with Daly also serving as a producer.

Palmer’s appointment therefore represents a confirmed change in the host’s role for the celebrity edition, while Daly remains part of the production and continues to host the standard version of the series.

In a Rolling Stone cover interview published Tuesday, Abrams said she was surprised by the number of follow-up stories presenting her relationship with Mescal as a professional liability.

The singer-songwriter reportedly reacted to those headlines by asking, “Are we on crack? Like, what the f—?” before saying the reaction reminded her why she avoids looking at social media.

Abrams was referring to coverage that interpreted an earlier comment about feeling secure in her relationship as evidence that Mescal himself had obstructed her creative ambitions.

Her clarification was direct: Abrams said the relationship had not taken away her ability to write or pursue her career, but had provided a new emotional perspective from which to make music.

What Abrams originally said

The online discussion followed an interview with Vogue published in June, in which Abrams described feeling uncertain about how a stable relationship might affect her songwriting.

“I was worried feeling secure and stable was threatening my drive to write music,” Abrams told Vogue, adding, “It freaked me out.”

Abrams’s concern, as described in the earlier interview, was about her own unfamiliarity with writing from within a relationship defined by security and love.

Coverage of the remarks subsequently used formulations suggesting that Mescal had nearly “ruined” or threatened Abrams’s career, although the original comments focused on the creative challenge of moving beyond the heartbreak and uncertainty that had often informed her work.

In the Rolling Stone interview, Abrams said she stood by what she had told Vogue but objected to the interpretation that her partner had interfered with her professional life.

A relationship that Abrams says expanded her writing

Abrams described the effect of her relationship with Mescal in strongly positive terms.

“It’s had the most amazing effect on my writing,” she said, according to Rolling Stone.

Abrams said the relationship had given her “the most amount of space to reflect on everything” in her life and had helped her reconsider earlier relationships, family dynamics and friendships.

She characterized that perspective as “the greatest gift, period.”

The comments position Abrams’s creative concern as a question of artistic subject matter rather than a claim that Mescal had limited her career.

Abrams has also discussed the relationship in connection with her album *Daughter From Hell*, which includes “Imaginary Friend,” a song she co-wrote with Mescal.

She has described making music with Mescal as natural, citing the couple’s shared musical environment and their familiarity with each other.

The album and the public conversation

The clarification comes as Abrams promotes *Daughter From Hell*, her third studio album.

Rolling Stone reported on July 26 that the album had become Abrams’s first number-one album.

The record includes contributions from Aaron Dessner of The National, Justin Vernon of Bon Iver, Abrams’s longtime collaborator Audrey Hobert and Mescal.

The album’s commercial performance does not, by itself, establish the extent to which Abrams’s relationship has influenced her career, but it provides contemporaneous evidence that the release has achieved a major professional milestone.

Abrams’s remarks also reflect the broader tension between public interest in celebrity relationships and artists’ efforts to define their work on their own terms.

The Express Tribune reported that Abrams discussed not only Mescal and songwriting but also the pressure of public attention and her mental health during the latest interview.

Abrams has previously acknowledged that public scrutiny can be difficult, while Mescal has also expressed a preference for keeping aspects of his personal life private.

The pair were first publicly linked after being seen together in London in 2024, and they have since become more open about their relationship while continuing to limit the details they share.

Abrams’s position

Abrams’s latest comments draw a distinction between the public narrative surrounding her relationship and her own account of its effect on her work.

She has not said that Mescal harmed her career or prevented her from creating music; rather, she has said that the security of the relationship initially made her question how she would write and ultimately gave her more material for reflection.

Her response therefore addresses the accuracy of the headlines, not simply the existence of public interest in her relationship.

For now, Abrams’s stated view is that her relationship with Mescal has broadened rather than diminished her creative life.

In an interview with Women’s Wear Daily published Wednesday, Arnaud said the upcoming season will contain “more of Scott,” although he declined to explain the character’s precise role in the story.

“There’s definitely more of Scott and Kip,” Arnaud said, referring to Scott’s relationship with Kip Grady, who is played by Robbie G.K.

Arnaud’s remarks provide the clearest recent confirmation that the pair will have a continuing presence in the series after their relationship became a central part of the first season’s LGBTQ+ storyline.

The actor also indicated that “various things” were being considered around Scott’s role, without identifying whether the character would appear in a supporting capacity, receive a larger storyline, or be involved in another production plan connected with the series.

A Fan-Favorite Relationship

Heated Rivalry follows the secret relationship between professional hockey players Shane Hollander and Ilya Rozanov, while Scott and Kip form a second queer romance within the same fictional world.

Scott is portrayed as a prominent hockey player, while Kip is his love interest, and the couple’s storyline culminated in Scott publicly acknowledging their relationship.

The story placed a same-sex relationship within the professional sports setting of the series and gave Scott and Kip a narrative distinct from the show’s primary romance.

Their continuation is significant for viewers who connected with a storyline about intimacy, visibility and the public consequences of coming out in a high-profile athletic environment.

Recent reporting has consistently identified Arnaud and G.K. as returning performers, although the production has not released a complete official season-two cast announcement in the sources reviewed for this report.

What Remains Undisclosed

Arnaud’s confirmation does not establish how many episodes will include Scott and Kip or whether their relationship will receive an independent subplot.

It also does not confirm that the second season will be primarily about Scott and Kip, a distinction that matters because the series’ central narrative remains focused on Shane and Ilya.

The available comments therefore confirm the actors’ involvement and the existence of additional Scott-and-Kip material, but they do not provide plot details beyond that point.

That limited disclosure is consistent with the production’s broader approach to the new season, whose story details have remained under wraps.

Production Context

The confirmation arrives as Arnaud receives increased attention beyond the television series, including a global ambassador role with Under Armour announced in late July.

Under Armour’s campaign featuring Arnaud is titled “For When It’s Hot” and promotes the company’s HeatGear products.

The campaign followed the actor’s visibility in Heated Rivalry, where his character wears athletic apparel during scenes involving professional hockey and his relationship with Kip.

The renewed attention has also kept Arnaud and G.K.’s on-screen partnership in public conversation ahead of the second season.

The PinkNews reported that both actors are set to reprise their roles, connecting their return to the conclusion of the first season, in which Scott publicly kissed Kip on the rink.

The Next Chapter

For now, the most specific update is Arnaud’s statement that the audience will see “definitely more” of Scott and Kip.

The wording confirms that the couple’s story is not being left entirely behind after the first season, but it leaves open the scale and direction of their next chapter.

It is also not yet clear whether the new episodes will focus on the practical challenges of Scott and Kip’s public relationship, explore their lives away from the rink, or use their story to illuminate the wider pressures faced by LGBTQ+ athletes.

Those possibilities should not be treated as confirmed plot points, because Arnaud did not disclose specific storylines in the interview.

What is confirmed is narrower and more concrete: Arnaud is returning as Scott Hunter, Robbie G.K. is associated with the continuing Kip Grady role, and Arnaud expects viewers to see more of Scott and Kip in the future of Heated Rivalry.

A Starz premiere date for North American audiences had not been announced in the available reporting. The network said the series would arrive on its channel and streaming service later in 2026.

The acquisition was announced amid renewed attention to the program’s subject matter and Davies’ long record of creating television focused on queer lives. Davies is the creator of Queer as Folk, It’s a Sin, Years and Years and the modern revival of Doctor Who. Channel 4 commissioned Tip Toe as a drama about the pressures facing LGBTQ+ communities and described the series as an examination of prejudice as it re-enters public life.

The story and its central characters

*Tip Toe* is set in Manchester, where Leo runs the Spit & Polish, a bar in the city’s Gay Village on Canal Street. Alan Cumming plays Leo, while David Morrissey plays Clive, Leo’s troubled next-door neighbor, an electrician and father of two teenage sons. The story begins with an apparently ordinary relationship between neighbors and develops into a conflict involving hostility, radicalization and threats to safety.

The premise places a queer-owned business and its surrounding community at the center of a thriller rather than treating LGBTQ+ characters as peripheral figures. Channel 4’s description says the series follows Leo and Clive as their relationship deteriorates while “words become weapons” and opinions become increasingly radicalized. The broadcaster characterized the production as a story about the re-emergence of a threat that many people had believed was no longer present.

The ensemble includes Luyanda Unati Lewis-Nyawo as Judy, the bar manager; Elizabeth Berrington as Stephanie, Leo’s best friend; Charlie Condou as Curtis, Leo’s ex-husband; Iz Hesketh as Zee; Shakeel Kimotho as Hanna; Paul Rhys as Melba; and Denise Welch as Diane. Pooky Quesnel plays Marie, Clive’s wife, while Jackson Connor and Joseph Evans play Clive’s sons, George and Saul.

The series was produced by Quay Street Productions, part of ITV Studios. Davies, producer Nicola Shindler, director Peter Hoar and Cumming serve as executive producers. Hoar previously directed It’s a Sin and has also worked on The Last of Us and Nolly.

A queer story shaped as a thriller

Davies has presented Tip Toe as a contemporary story about the anxieties surrounding LGBTQ+ communities rather than as a period drama. Channel 4 said the series asks what happens when social tensions intensify and prejudice becomes harder to distinguish from misinformation and deliberate incitement. The drama’s setting is especially meaningful within Davies’ body of work: Manchester’s Canal Street was also central to Queer as Folk, the landmark series that helped establish his reputation as a writer of queer television.

The program’s LGBTQ+ perspective is also reflected in its central location. The Spit & Polish is not simply a backdrop for the plot; it is Leo’s workplace and a gathering point for characters connected to Manchester’s queer community. The Channel 4 press materials identify Leo as the bar’s owner and describe the establishment as being located in Manchester’s Gay Village.

That focus distinguishes Tip Toe from a conventional domestic thriller in which queer identity might appear only as an incidental detail. The series instead builds its conflict around the vulnerability of a visible LGBTQ+ community and the personal consequences of hostility directed toward it. This description comes from the program’s official premise; the extent to which the completed series advances or complicates those themes remains a matter for viewers and critics to assess.

From Channel 4 to Starz

In the United Kingdom, Tip Toe was broadcast and streamed by Channel 4 in five episodes beginning in late May 2026. Channel 4 later reported that the drama reached 2.2 million viewers across linear broadcasting and streaming during its first seven days, making it the top drama series across commercial British broadcaster-video-on-demand services in June.

The Starz acquisition extends the series’ distribution beyond its original market while preserving its connection to a British broadcaster and production company. Starz described the drama as “gripping and deeply affecting” and said it speaks to cultural tensions and anxieties shaping contemporary life. That characterization is the network’s assessment of its acquisition and should be understood as promotional language rather than an independent critical judgment.

Davies welcomed the North American deal and praised Starz for taking on the series. According to reporting by *Deadline*, he said the network showed the “nerve” to release a drama addressing hostility toward minorities during a politically charged period. The remarks were reported in the context of the acquisition announcement and reflect Davies’ stated view of the series’ social relevance.

Cumming’s involvement further connects the project to queer representation in mainstream entertainment. The actor, who is openly bisexual, plays Leo, the queer bar owner at the center of the story. The available official materials identify Cumming’s character and the series’ setting, while the production’s broader LGBTQ+ significance derives from its subject matter, creative leadership and ensemble of characters.

For viewers in the United States and English-speaking Canada, the immediate news is not a new season announcement or a confirmed premiere date, but the securing of a prominent streaming home for a new queer-led drama. Starz’s eventual release will make Davies’ latest exploration of LGBTQ+ life and contemporary prejudice available to a substantially wider English-language audience. The precise launch date and any additional distribution details remain unannounced in the sources reviewed.

The 61-year-old dancer and choreographer discussed the experience on Judgemental, the podcast he presents with fellow Strictly judge Anton Du Beke.

“I went on holiday in Madrid and got stabbed, that was nice, and it was stinking hot,” Revel Horwood said, according to reports of the podcast discussion.

He said his jewellery was taken during the attack, with the assailants ripping a necklace from his neck and leaving what he described as a burn mark.

Revel Horwood said the weapon was a razor blade and that he was slashed in the stomach while returning from a club.

He recalled the incident taking place at about 2 a.m., adding that late-night dining and entertainment were common during the holiday.

The reports do not identify the year of the attack, the location of the club, the extent of Revel Horwood’s injuries, or whether a police investigation followed.

From Madrid to France

Revel Horwood linked the Madrid holiday to a period when he had been performing at the Lido in Paris.

“Then when I got back, I got strip-searched,” he said.

He said French officers searched him “down to literally nothing” because they were looking for drugs.

He also said he had not shaved and looked dishevelled at the time, while the injuries and marks around his neck remained visible after the attack.

The available reports do not establish whether the search occurred at an airport, a railway station or another border-control point.

They also do not report whether officers found any drugs or whether charges, detention or other legal proceedings resulted from the search.

Because the episode was recounted by Revel Horwood in conversation rather than presented with supporting police, medical or court records, the details should be understood as his account of the events.

The Podcast Conversation

*Judgemental* is a podcast hosted by Revel Horwood and Du Beke, both judges on the BBC’s *Strictly Come Dancing*.

The programme launched in June 2026 as a Rayo production, with episodes made available through the Rayo app and major podcast platforms.

The podcast’s format brings the two television personalities together for conversations in which they discuss personal experiences and their views on a range of subjects.

The Madrid account was reported on August 3, 2026, in coverage by The Independent, the Evening Standard and the *Irish News*.

The three reports carry substantially the same central details and attribute the account to Revel Horwood’s podcast remarks.

No statement from Spanish or French authorities, the relevant transport provider, or a representative of Revel Horwood was included in the reports reviewed.

What Is Confirmed

The confirmed recent news is that Revel Horwood publicly described the alleged attack and subsequent search during a podcast conversation, rather than that authorities have independently confirmed the incident.

His account includes four main elements: a holiday in Madrid, the theft of jewellery, a slash to his stomach with a razor blade, and a later strip search in France.

The reporting does not provide enough information to determine the precise chronology of the journey, the identity of any attacker, or the identities of the officers involved.

It is therefore not possible from the available evidence to independently verify the circumstances of the stabbing, the value of the stolen jewellery, the medical treatment received, or the legal basis for the search.

Revel Horwood’s recollection nevertheless describes a holiday that combined a violent theft with an invasive border search, and it has become the subject of news coverage because of his prominent role on British television.

The rapper addressed comments about her appearance during a recent Instagram Live after followers reportedly urged her to have another reduction.

“I don't need to go get my a– reduced,” Cardi said during the livestream. “News flash: I did get my a– reduced.”

The comments came after discussion of her changed appearance and weight loss, which Billboard attributed to her diet, the demands of touring and stress connected with a breakup.

Cardi said she has not had recent cosmetic surgery and identified January 2024 as the date of her most recent reported buttocks-reduction operation.

Why she said she did not pursue another procedure

Cardi explained that she could not simply use liposuction to reduce the area because, in her words, her skin is “kinda loose.”

“That’s why my a– shakes so much,” she said, adding that a liposuction-based reduction could cause her buttocks to “drop.”

Cardi said the alternative would require making incisions and a lengthy recovery period, which she does not want.

“So I would have to cut myself, and I’m not cutting myself,” she said. “I’m not sitting down for four months. I’m outside, like I said.”

She also said that she likes her current appearance and feels comfortable with her body.

“I like my body how it looks right now,” Cardi said. “I’m comfortable in my skin.”

Her history with biopolymer injections

Cardi has previously said that she received buttocks injections at age 21.

The material has been described in the coverage as biopolymer or silicone-based filler that is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Page Six reported that Cardi previously said in 2018 that she received the injections in a basement in Queens, New York, and paid $800.

The same report quoted Cardi describing the injections as extremely painful and saying that fluid leaked for several days afterward.

In August 2022, she underwent surgery to remove most of the polymers that had been injected.

E! News reported that the removal process began in 2022 and that Cardi later confirmed she had another extraction in January 2024.

During a September 2024 Instagram Live, Cardi said the January 2024 procedure took place after she filmed “Like What” and involved removing additional injections.

She also said that surgery addressed “certain things” connected with fibrosis.

“Two lipos and one ass reduction”

During the latest livestream, Cardi said she is open about her cosmetic procedures.

“I’m very honest about surgery,” she said, according to E! News. “First of all, I got two lipos and one ass reduction.”

Page Six reported that Cardi attributed her decision to reduce her buttocks in part to her petite frame, saying that she is “a small girl.”

The rapper had previously discussed the possibility of removing more material after her Little Miss Drama Tour.

In February, she reportedly said she planned to travel to Colombia after the tour to have some of the injections removed.

The following month, however, she said during an appearance on TODAY that she had changed her mind because she did not have time for the recovery.

“I was saying that, but I’m not going to do it,” she said. “I was just gonna take a little bit of butt out, but I don’t have time for that.”

Cardi also said at that time that she felt comfortable with her body as it was.

A personal account, not medical advice

The reports describe Cardi’s statements about her own procedures and recovery decisions; they do not present her comments as medical guidance.

E! News described the injected material as a non-FDA-approved liquid silicone gel that can cause serious health complications.

Cardi has previously warned people against seeking buttocks injections.

The current reports establish that Cardi says she had the injections reduced in multiple procedures, including surgery in August 2022 and another operation in January 2024.

They also establish why she says she is not pursuing another reduction now: she does not want the incisions, possible sagging associated with the approach she described, or an extended recovery period.

“If you’ll notice, women don’t Method act because we have things to take care of, so we can’t completely lose our minds,” Taylor-Joy said during an interview with Complex News published July 29.

The comment circulated widely in early August, prompting renewed debate about the differences between professional immersion, conventional acting preparation and the behavior sometimes associated with high-profile Method performers.

Taylor-Joy did not say that women are incapable of Method acting, nor did she identify a specific group of women who do not use the approach. Her remarks focused instead on the demands of sustaining an intense psychological immersion while remaining accountable to the other people involved in a production.

“Controlled Psychosis”

Taylor-Joy described her approach to acting as “a controlled psychosis.”

She explained that an actor may spend as many as 16 hours a day imagining another person’s thoughts, moving like that person and inhabiting their home and clothes.

Taylor-Joy compared the experience to having “a sister or a roommate” temporarily present in her mind. She said people close to her understand that process and can help her return to herself if the identification with a character becomes excessive.

The actor also said she could not imagine maintaining that level of immersion continuously because film and television productions involve large teams.

“You’re going to work with hundreds of people and it is your responsibility to be good to them and to help them do their best job,” she said.

She added that being overly invested in behaving badly would undermine the collaborative nature of a production.

A Debate About Gender and Professional Expectations

Coverage of the remarks has framed them as part of a longer-running debate about whether men and women face different professional consequences when they pursue extreme on-set behavior in the name of artistic commitment.

Some reports characterized Taylor-Joy’s point as an argument that women have less freedom to “lose themselves” in a role because they are expected to continue managing practical responsibilities and workplace relationships.

That interpretation goes beyond Taylor-Joy’s exact wording, however, because she did not explicitly say that women would be punished, blacklisted or otherwise penalized for using Method techniques. Her stated concern was that an actor cannot allow immersion to interfere with the work of the wider production.

Reporting on the clip has also emphasized that women do use Method-related techniques, while noting that public discussions often focus on highly visible examples of male performers who remain in character or adopt demanding behavior outside filmed scenes. The distinction matters because “Method acting” can refer both to formal exercises used in actor training and to a broader popular shorthand for remaining psychologically or physically immersed in a role.

Taylor-Joy’s Broader Acting Philosophy

The comments form part of a wider explanation Taylor-Joy gave about how she builds characters. She said she looks for a character’s “resting face,” or the person they are when they are not performing for others, and tries to think the thoughts that character would think.

Taylor-Joy connected that internal process to what audiences see on screen, saying that the character’s thoughts can be communicated through physical behavior and expression. She did not present herself as an actor who remains fully in character at all times, and reports of the interview noted that she said she had never gone “full Method.”

The interview was conducted as Taylor-Joy promoted Lucky, an Apple TV series in which she serves as both lead actor and executive producer. The conversation also covered her acting process, the series, fashion, astrology and her work on Dune: Part Three.

Taylor-Joy’s comments therefore addressed both performance and workplace conduct. Her formulation suggested that deep engagement with a character can coexist with a clear boundary between the actor’s internal work and the obligations owed to fellow cast and crew members.

The clip’s renewed circulation has made that boundary the central point of discussion: Taylor-Joy linked the practical responsibilities she associates with women to her rejection of losing control, while also describing acting as an immersive process that can temporarily reshape how a performer thinks and behaves.