“There’s definitely a rumor that Cara and I, like, dated, which is not true,” Jenner says in a confessional scene in the trailer.

The trailer was released on September 17, placing Jenner’s comments within the promotional campaign for the upcoming season rather than presenting them as part of a separately published interview.

The footage then shows Jenner with Delevingne at what entertainment coverage identifies as a fashion-related event.

Jenner continues the exchange with a sexual joke, saying, “By the way, I have nothing against having sex with Cara.”

She then adds, “Never say never, right?” while addressing Delevingne, who laughs in response.

The trailer therefore presents two distinct points: Jenner says the pair did not date, while also making a lighthearted statement that leaves open the possibility of a future sexual relationship.

A Longstanding Public Speculation

The dating rumors have circulated alongside public interest in Jenner and Delevingne’s friendship and their shared careers as fashion models.

Recent coverage describes Delevingne as a longtime friend of Jenner, rather than identifying the two as former romantic partners.

The new trailer does not provide evidence that the two women had a romantic relationship, and Jenner’s explicit statement is that they did not date.

It also does not establish that Jenner and Delevingne have had sex; the available footage contains only Jenner’s joke and her statement that she is not opposed to the possibility.

That distinction is important because the trailer’s playful tone could otherwise blur the difference between a denial of past dating and speculation about a possible future encounter.

The Context of *The Kardashians*

The exchange appears in a trailer for season eight of The Kardashians, the Hulu reality series centered on members of the Kardashian-Jenner family.

Hulu’s promotional material says the eighth season will premiere on October 8 on Hulu and on Hulu through Disney+ bundle access in the United States, with international availability on Disney+.

The trailer includes other family storylines, including material involving Kim Kardashian’s health and the family’s personal relationships.

Jenner’s comments are presented as one of several personal-life storylines used to preview the season.

Because the comments appear in a trailer, the released footage offers only a short excerpt and does not show the broader conversation that led to Jenner’s remarks.

No further explanation from Jenner or Delevingne about the origins of the rumor was included in the reports reviewed for this article.

LGBTQ+ Context and Responsible Reporting

Delevingne has publicly identified as a lesbian, but that identity does not establish that she and Jenner were romantically involved.

Likewise, Jenner’s comments in the trailer do not amount to a public declaration of a sexual orientation or gender identity.

The most substantiated account currently available is narrower: Jenner rejected the claim that she and Delevingne dated and made a sexual joke about her friend.

The footage does not justify labeling either woman’s identity beyond what each has publicly stated.

Jenner’s answer also illustrates how celebrities can respond to persistent speculation without confirming the premise behind it.

In this case, she directly contradicted the dating claim while using humor to control the tone of the exchange.

What the Trailer Establishes

The trailer establishes that Jenner is aware of the rumor and has chosen to address it publicly on the show.

It establishes that she said the two models did not date.

It establishes that she joked about having sex with Delevingne and added, “Never say never.”

It establishes that Delevingne laughed during the exchange.

It does not establish that the women dated, that they had sex, or that either has changed how they publicly identifies.

For now, Jenner’s comments are best understood as a denial of a past dating rumor accompanied by a deliberately provocative joke, rather than confirmation of a relationship.

The comments came during an episode of Apple Music’s The Zane Lowe Show published on September 17, in which Cyrus discussed the practical and personal reasons behind the Los Angeles engagement. Entertainment Weekly separately reported that Cyrus described the Hollywood Bowl arrangement as aligned with her goal of performing without returning to the demands of conventional touring.

“I think you would have to do a residency of 80 shows at the Bowl to satisfy the level of demand,” radio host Zane Lowe told Cyrus during the interview, according to People.

Cyrus responded that such an arrangement reflected her own idea, calling the concerts “the ultimate dress rehearsal.” She also described the engagement as “proof of concept and potentially the beginning of something broader, but within your own terms.”

The remarks indicate interest in a residency-style model, but they do not amount to an announcement of a confirmed residency, a venue contract, or additional dates. As of September 18, the only newly announced Cyrus performances connected to the project are the two Hollywood Bowl shows scheduled for October.

The Hollywood Bowl Engagement

Cyrus is scheduled to perform at the Hollywood Bowl in Los Angeles on Friday, October 16, and Sunday, October 18, 2026. The concerts are billed as “Miley: Bass Persuades — Live at the Hollywood Bowl,” with Model/Actriz announced as the special guest.

Pollstar reported that the shows were announced to celebrate Cyrus’s 10th studio album, Bass Persuades, which is scheduled for release through Atlantic Records on September 18.

The performances represent a major return to a standalone concert setting for Cyrus. People reported that the engagement will be her first major performances since her appearance at the Corona Capital music festival in Mexico City in November 2022.

The Hollywood Bowl’s location is central to Cyrus’s stated rationale for the shows. She told Lowe that she selected the venue partly because it would allow her to return home quickly after performing.

“I chose to do the show at the Bowl because I knew that my bed was only going to be like a 10-minute drive home by 11,” Cyrus said, according to People.

She also spoke about maintaining a routine and treating the performances as part of an ordinary day rather than as the beginning of an extended period on the road.

Demand and the Residency Model

The residency discussion followed strong reported demand for the Hollywood Bowl dates. People reported that the presale queue was estimated to have reached nearly 1.5 million fans.

That figure was presented in coverage of the interview and has not been identified in the available reports as an independently audited count of unique prospective ticket buyers. It therefore describes the reported size of the queue rather than confirmed ticket sales or the number of people who ultimately attended the concerts.

Cyrus connected that demand with her view that a fixed-location engagement could be more compatible with her life and working preferences than a tour requiring repeated travel between cities.

“People will come to me. I don’t need to drive to you,” Cyrus said in the interview, according to People.

A residency generally involves an artist performing multiple shows in one venue or city over a defined period, reducing the travel associated with an arena or international tour. Cyrus’s comments specifically point toward that format, although they leave open the question of whether any future engagement would take place at the Hollywood Bowl, in Las Vegas, or elsewhere.

What Has—and Has Not—Been Announced

The current information supports a clear distinction between a planned concert engagement and a confirmed residency. Cyrus has announced two October performances, a new album, and a possible broader live-performance concept, but no schedule for an extended run has been published in the available reporting.

The available reports also do not establish that Cyrus has signed a residency agreement or selected a permanent venue. The number of future performances, ticketing arrangements, production plans, and dates—if a residency proceeds—remain unannounced.

For now, the Hollywood Bowl shows will serve as the immediate test of Cyrus’s return to major live performance. Her own description of the concerts as a “proof of concept” makes the possible residency an emerging plan rather than a completed announcement.

A striking black dress worn by the late Princess Diana on the day her estranged husband publicly admitted adultery is going up for auction at Sotheby’s, with a presale estimate of up to $300,000.

First, the “revenge dress,” as it has become known, is going on an international tour, testament to the enduring global fascination with Diana almost 30 years after her death.

The garment, which went on public display Friday at Sotheby’s in London, was worn by Diana on June 29, 1994, the broadcast date of an interview in which the then-Prince Charles acknowledged infidelity.

Diana, who knew the revelation was coming, chose to wear the figure-hugging, off-the-shoulder silk dress by Greek designer Christina Stambolian for a gala at London’s Serpentine Gallery.

Morgane Halimi, Sotheby’s global head of handbags and fashion, said Diana chose the “beautiful and powerful outfit” as a way to seize control of her own story.

“She always used fashion as a way of expression, but this time (it) was a way to communicate her personal expression of herself,” Halimi said. “The way she felt on that day is that, ‘I’m taking back the story and I’m here and I stand for myself.’”

Images of Diana in the dress, accessorized with a sapphire necklace, black pumps and bright red nail polish, shot around the world. The Sun tabloid proclaimed on its front page the next day: “Revenge is chic.”

The following year Diana gave an interview in which she acknowledged her own extramarital affair, and famously said “there were three of us in this marriage,” in reference to Charles’ paramour Camilla Parker-Bowles, now Queen Camilla. Charles and Diana divorced in 1996, a year before Diana was killed in a car crash in Paris at the age of 36.

The dress is being auctioned for the first time since 1997, when Diana sold it and other garments to raise money for AIDS charities. It has a presale estimate of $150,000 to $300,000, but Sotheby’s experts would not be surprised if it far exceeds that price.

A red sweater adorned with sheep that Diana wore to a polo match in 1981 sold in 2023 for $1.1 million, many times its presale estimate and a record for an item owned by the late royal.

“I personally believe that this dress is the most powerful item linked to Diana,” Halimi said.

“The Diana provenance always attracts collectors,” she added. “But the story of this dress and the universal message that it brings will definitely attract also institutions as well as private collectors who are looking for unique pieces and one-of-a kind items.”

In her lifetime, Diana was a style icon and one of the world’s most photographed women. Her star power has not dimmed, and neither has the fascination with the dramatic disintegration of her marriage to the now King Charles III. A new book by Diana’s brother Charles Spencer has seized headlines again and reignited a public feud between the Spencers and the royal family over the treatment of the princess.

The revenge dress is on show in London until Sept. 24 and travels to Hong Kong and Geneva ahead of its sale in New York on Dec. 9.

Kardashian has sought to move on since the court last year found eight people guilty for their roles in what the celebrity described as “the most terrifying experience of my life.” She and stylist Simone Harouche expressed gratitude to the French justice system in a joint statement.

“The experience was deeply traumatic, and its impact has stayed with us. Today’s decision is not about the compensation, but about accountability and recognition,” the statement to The Associated Press read. “We are thankful to the Court and everyone who supported us throughout this process, and we hope to now move forward and continue to heal.”

The court awarded a former receptionist at the Hôtel de Pourtalès 109,516 euros ($126,472), according to his lawyer. Kardashian had been staying at the hotel when the robbery gang targeted her.

The receptionist said he had been traumatized by the Oct. 2, 2016, jewel heist during Fashion Week. He had sought 550,000 euros ($634,868) in damages and interest. His lawyer, Mohand Ouidja, welcomed the decision as a victory.

The lawyer read the court’s written decisions pertaining to Kardashian and the others aloud to the AP.

The court awarded the hotel 50,000 euros ($57,741). It awarded 1 euro — the amount she had requested — to Harouche, Kardashian’s stylist who was present during the robbery.

French lawyers who acted for Kardashian during the trial didn't respond to text messages and phone calls this week from the AP.

Two of the robbers, dressed as police, forced their way into her suite, bound Kardashian with zip ties and tape and made off with more than $6 million in jewelry, including a diamond ring she’d worn that night to a Givenchy show.

Because of their ages, the robbers became known in France as “les papys braqueurs,” or the grandpa robbers. Six of them were in their 60s and 70s when they were tried for armed robbery, kidnapping, gang association and other charges.

With time already served in pretrial detention, none of those found guilty went back to prison. None of them appealed the verdict.

Kardashian said in a statement issued after their conviction that she was “deeply grateful to the French authorities for pursuing justice in this case.”

“The crime was the most terrifying experience of my life, leaving a lasting impact on me and my family,” the celebrity said. “While I’ll never forget what happened, I believe in the power of growth and accountability and pray for healing for all. I remain committed to advocating for justice and promoting a fair legal system.”

The reports identify the child as a girl and say she was born June 9 at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. Billboard separately reported the same name and birth details while noting that the couple had not publicly commented.

Neither Gaga nor Polansky has publicly confirmed the child’s name, sex, or birth date, according to PEOPLE. The information should therefore be understood as reported rather than as an announcement made directly by the couple.

The name was reported on September 17, within days of the first public reports that Gaga and Polansky had become parents.

A connection to Gaga’s music

According to a source cited by PEOPLE, the first name Rose was inspired by “La Vie En Rose,” the song Gaga performed in the 2018 film A Star Is Born.

Gaga’s performance of the song appeared in A Star Is Born, in which she played Ally, an aspiring singer whose career develops alongside a relationship with musician Jackson Maine. Billboard reported that the film’s soundtrack spent four weeks at No. 1 on the Billboard 200.

The song itself is associated with French singer Édith Piaf, whose recording of “La Vie En Rose” became an internationally recognized standard. Billboard also reported that Gaga has a large rose tattoo on her back accompanied by the words “la vie en rose.”

The reported connection between Rose and Gaga’s performance is attributed to a source rather than to a statement from Gaga herself.

The reported significance of “Bean”

The middle name Bean has also been linked in media reports to Carl Bean, a singer, minister, and activist whose work has been associated with the history of LGBTQ+ music and advocacy.

Entertainment Weekly, citing PEOPLE, reported that Carl Bean’s 1977 recording of “I Was Born This Way” helped inspire Gaga’s 2011 album and single “Born This Way.”

Gaga released “Born This Way” as the title track and lead single from her 2011 album of the same name. The song became closely associated with LGBTQ+ audiences because of its message of self-acceptance and its references to sexual orientation and gender identity.

Entertainment Weekly described the reported name as reflecting recurring themes in Gaga’s work, connecting “Rose” to “La Vie En Rose” and “Bean” to the legacy of “Born This Way.”

However, the reports do not establish definitively that the middle name was chosen as a tribute to Carl Bean. PEOPLE characterized the explanation as information from a source, while TMZ reported that the origin of “Rose Bean” was unclear.

Gaga and Polansky become parents

The reports about the baby’s name follow confirmation that Gaga and Polansky had welcomed their first child together.

PEOPLE first reported on September 11 that the couple had become parents after they were photographed with a newborn during an outing in California. The Los Angeles Times also reported the birth news, citing photographs and earlier coverage from Page Six.

At the time of those initial reports, the baby’s name, sex, and date of birth had not been disclosed. The later report naming Rose Bean Polansky therefore added details that had not been publicly available when the birth was first reported.

PEOPLE reported that Gaga and Polansky have been spending time away from the spotlight with their child. A separate PEOPLE report said the couple had taken time away from work to focus on their baby and quoted a source describing them as happy to be parents.

Gaga and Polansky became engaged in 2024, according to PEOPLE. The child is the first for both Gaga and Polansky, according to PEOPLE and Entertainment Weekly.

What remains unconfirmed

The reported name has appeared across multiple entertainment and music-news outlets, including PEOPLE, TMZ, Billboard, and Entertainment Weekly.

The available coverage relies on reported sources and, in TMZ’s account, a birth certificate, rather than a public statement from Gaga or Polansky.

The couple has not publicly explained the choice of Rose, Bean, or the full name Rose Bean Polansky. Until they do so, the reported musical and cultural connections remain explanations attributed to sources rather than confirmed statements by the family.

Aiken, 47, described the incident during a Sept. 17 interview with Page Six Radio, revisiting a controversy that began with an appearance on Live with Regis and Kelly and escalated during a live discussion on The View.

“I died inside a lot that week,” Aiken told Page Six Radio host Evan Real. He also recalled being asleep in Los Angeles when the segment aired and being awakened by Jaymes Foster, the mother of his son.

“I got woken up by my son’s mother who said, ‘You need to wake up because Rosie just outed you on The View,’” Aiken said. “I woke up. I was freaked out,” he added.

How the dispute began

The controversy stemmed from Aiken’s Nov. 17, 2006, appearance as a substitute for Regis Philbin on Live with Regis and Kelly. During the program, Aiken playfully placed his hand over Kelly Ripa’s mouth while attempting to speak to the guests.

Ripa objected to the gesture, calling it “a no-no.” Entertainment Weekly reported that Ripa also said, “I don’t know where that hand’s been, honey.”

Ripa addressed the incident again after Philbin returned to the program on Nov. 20, 2006. The following day, she called into *The View*, where O’Donnell defended Aiken and characterized Ripa’s response as homophobic.

“Now listen, to me that was a homophobic remark,” O’Donnell said on the program. She argued that Ripa might have reacted differently if the person involved had been a straight man or a man whose sexuality was not questioned.

Ripa called into the broadcast and described O’Donnell’s characterization as “outrageous.” Ripa said her objection concerned Aiken placing his hand over her mouth after he had been shaking hands with people in the audience, according to USA TODAY’s account.

“You say defended, I say outed”

During the new interview, Real referred to O’Donnell as having defended Aiken. Aiken corrected him: “You say defended, I say outed.”

Aiken had not publicly disclosed that he was gay at the time of the 2006 broadcast. He publicly came out in a September 2008 People magazine cover story, two years after the televised incident.

Aiken said he does not blame O’Donnell for what happened. “I don’t have any ill feelings against Rosie,” he said. “She did mean well.”

Aiken said O’Donnell’s words were chosen in the heat of the exchange and that she was caught off guard. O’Donnell’s representatives and Ripa’s representatives were contacted for comment by the outlets reporting on Aiken’s remarks.

Using humor to manage the fallout

The dispute unfolded on the same day that Aiken and actor Tori Spelling presented an award at the 2006 American Music Awards in Los Angeles.

Aiken said Spelling helped him respond publicly by suggesting that they make light of the situation during the ceremony. During their presentation, Spelling placed her hand over Aiken’s mouth and joked, “And I’ll tell you where that hand’s been later.”

USA TODAY reported that Aiken and Spelling used the awards appearance to spoof the controversy while presenting an award.

Aiken later described the period as “probably the most catastrophic week of my life” in a June interview on the Hollywood Raw podcast. In that account, he said he had felt unable to explain himself during the original television appearance and worried that he had upset Ripa.

Aiken said he sent Ripa flowers after the incident. He said Ripa later apologized for the controversy becoming overblown and told him she would welcome him back on the program.

Aiken said he attempted to return to the show but was not permitted to do so, adding that he had not pursued another appearance since.

Why he is discussing it now

Aiken told Page Six Radio that the 2006 episode rarely comes to mind, but that he had thought about it more during the three months before the interview because people had been asking him about it.

The renewed attention follows Aiken’s recent reflections on the controversy and does not represent a new public dispute between him, O’Donnell and Ripa, based on the reports available for this article.

Aiken’s account distinguishes between O’Donnell’s stated intention to defend him and the personal impact of discussing his sexuality publicly before he had chosen to do so himself. His comments also underscore that a person’s sexual orientation is theirs to disclose, regardless of whether another person believes a public reference is supportive or protective.

The casting was confirmed on September 17, 2026, when Empire published an exclusive first look at Gerwig’s film and identified Streep as the voice of the mythical lion at the center of Lewis’s fictional world.

The announcement resolves months of industry speculation over whether Streep would join the project. Earlier reporting had described her as being in discussions to play Aslan, while the new coverage presents the casting as finalized.

Gerwig told Empire that she wanted Aslan to be voiced by someone “profound but not pretentious,” with “gravitas but not morose self-seriousness.”

She also said she was looking for a performer capable of communicating “depth and pathos as well as joy and delight.”

Gerwig described age and experience as part of the casting brief, saying she wanted someone older than 70 who could convey wisdom while retaining “fresh wonder, like a child.”

She added that the desired actor had to be “one of the greatest actors to ever do it,” saying that the list of candidates was not long.

The First Look at Aslan

The first-look material depicts a new interpretation of Aslan, the talking lion who creates and protects the world of Narnia in Lewis’s mythology.

According to Empire, Gerwig’s version of the character has heterochromic eyes and a face marked by bold red stripes.

Gerwig identified David Bowie as a creative influence on both Aslan’s appearance and the film’s broader sensibility.

The production’s visual approach is part of a wider effort to present The Magician’s Nephew as a distinct interpretation of Lewis’s material rather than as a direct remake of the earlier screen adaptation of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.

The film begins with The Magician’s Nephew, Lewis’s origin story for Narnia, rather than with The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, the best-known entry in the series and the first novel adapted for the 2005 theatrical film.

The production has also been described as having a strong musical dimension, with Gerwig discussing influences that include Bowie and the Who.

The available reporting identifies Aslan as male, while Streep’s casting means the character will be voiced by a woman in this adaptation.

The announcement therefore confirms a change in voice casting, but the sources reviewed do not describe the film as changing Aslan’s identity or narrative role.

Gerwig and Streep Reunite

The film reunites Gerwig with Streep after their collaboration on Little Women, Gerwig’s 2019 adaptation of Louisa May Alcott’s novel.

Streep appeared in Little Women as Aunt March, while Gerwig wrote and directed the film.

For Narnia, Streep’s role is primarily vocal, with her performance attached to the digital and visual realization of Aslan rather than to an on-screen human character.

Gerwig’s explanation emphasizes vocal qualities, emotional range and authority rather than celebrity recognition alone.

The director’s comments also indicate that she was seeking a performance that could combine solemnity with playfulness, reflecting Aslan’s role as both a powerful supernatural figure and a source of wonder within the story.

Release Plans

Narnia: The Magician’s Nephew is scheduled to open in IMAX and other cinemas on February 12, 2027.

The film is scheduled to arrive on Netflix on April 2, 2027, following its theatrical run.

The release schedule represents a change from an earlier plan that had placed the film’s theatrical opening around Thanksgiving 2026.

The project is being developed as the first of Gerwig’s planned adaptations of Lewis’s Chronicles of Narnia books.

The currently reported cast also includes Emma Mackey as the White Witch, alongside Carey Mulligan and Daniel Craig.

The story of The Magician’s Nephew*is set around the creation of Narnia and the origins of several elements that later become central to Lewis’s fictional universe.

The film’s first-look announcement places Streep’s voice at the center of Netflix’s introduction to Gerwig’s version of that mythology.

For now, the confirmed information concerns the casting, the initial design of Aslan and the release timetable; further details about Streep’s recording process and the film’s final performance style have not been disclosed in the sources reviewed.

The trailer was released by Hulu on September 17, 2026, and shows Kardashian, 45, in a hospital bed before she discusses the diagnosis with people around her.

“I have something called esophagitis,” Kardashian says in the preview.

A voice in the trailer then asks whether esophagitis was the condition that caused her father’s death, and Kardashian responds affirmatively.

The footage does not provide a detailed account of Kardashian’s symptoms, the cause of her esophagitis, the treatment she received or the length of any hospitalization.

It also does not say that Kardashian has esophageal cancer.

What esophagitis means

Esophagitis is inflammation or irritation of the tissue lining the esophagus, the muscular tube that carries food and liquids from the mouth to the stomach.

The condition can be associated with painful or difficult swallowing, heartburn and chest pain, although the trailer does not identify which symptoms Kardashian experienced.

The Mayo Clinic identifies several possible causes of esophagitis, including stomach acid backing up into the esophagus, certain medications, infections and allergic reactions.

Kardashian has not publicly identified the cause of her diagnosis in the material released so far.

Esophagitis and esophageal cancer are different medical conditions.

Untreated or recurring inflammation can sometimes contribute to complications, including Barrett’s esophagus, a condition in which the lining of the esophagus changes after damage commonly associated with long-term acid reflux.

Barrett’s esophagus can increase the risk of esophageal cancer, but the presence of esophagitis alone does not establish that a person has Barrett’s esophagus or cancer.

Connection to Robert Kardashian Sr.

Robert Kardashian Sr., Kim Kardashian’s father, died from esophageal cancer in 2003 at the age of 59.

The family connection is central to the trailer’s presentation of Kardashian’s health scare because the exchange about her diagnosis immediately references her father’s death.

The trailer does not state that Kardashian’s esophagitis is hereditary, nor does it establish that her diagnosis is related to her father’s cancer.

Medical sources describe esophagitis as inflammation of the esophagus, while esophageal cancer is a malignant disease involving cells in that organ.

Because Kardashian’s disclosure comes from a short television preview, publicly available information does not establish whether she has any continuing symptoms or whether the condition has resolved.

What the trailer shows

The preview includes footage of Kardashian in a hospital setting and appears to show her being prepared for or undergoing a medical procedure, but it does not identify the procedure.

Reports based on the trailer describe the hospitalization as a recent health scare, but neither Kardashian nor her representatives had publicly released a detailed medical statement in the coverage reviewed for this article.

The available footage therefore confirms Kardashian’s own disclosure of an esophagitis diagnosis but leaves important clinical details undisclosed.

That distinction is important because a television trailer is not a substitute for a complete medical report, and Kardashian’s diagnosis should not be expanded beyond what she and the program have explicitly shown.

Season eight

Hulu’s official season-eight announcement says that the new season of *The Kardashians* will premiere October 8, 2026, in the United States, with international availability on Disney+.

The trailer combines Kardashian’s health disclosure with other personal and family storylines involving the Kardashian-Jenner family.

The program may provide additional context about Kardashian’s diagnosis when the season airs, but no further verified medical details were included in the promotional material examined.

For now, the confirmed information is limited to Kardashian’s statement that she has esophagitis, the trailer’s depiction of her in a hospital setting and the emotional connection the preview draws to her father’s history of esophageal cancer.

Stone discussed the experience in an interview published by Variety on September 17, 2026, while reflecting on her career and the lasting public response to her best-known role.

Asked whether people were afraid of her after Basic Instinct, Stone answered, “Yes.”

She then described how publicity interviews were arranged: “What they would do is they would show the film to the press and then bring them in to interview me.”

“They were terrified, and they would sit down opposite me and panic,” Stone said.

A role that followed her

Stone played Catherine Tramell, a wealthy crime novelist suspected of murder, in Paul Verhoeven’s Basic Instinct.

The film became closely associated with Stone’s performance, including an interrogation scene that generated extensive public discussion when the movie was released.

In the scene, Tramell projects control and challenges the authority of the investigators questioning her.

Stone connected the response to the character’s refusal to conform to conventional expectations of women.

“I think that the basic construct of a woman declaring herself as separate and indomitable was, and remains, a terrifying construct,” she said.

The quote was also reported by People, which described Stone as saying that people remain afraid of her “in one way or another.”

Stone said the reaction has not entirely disappeared.

“That hasn’t changed; people are still terrified of me in one way or another,” she said.

The distinction between actor and character

Stone’s comments describe a recurring consequence of playing a culturally prominent villain: viewers and interviewers may carry impressions of the fictional character into encounters with the actor.

The reports do not establish that every journalist who interviewed Stone was afraid of her, nor do they provide independent accounts from those interviewers.

The account is Stone’s recollection of how press interviews were conducted and how interviewers responded after viewing the film.

A separate interview published earlier in September focused on a different aspect of the role’s impact.

In that interview, Stone said the character’s darkness attracted people who believed she resembled Tramell.

“Real dark people identified and came into my life thinking, ‘Oh, you really are like me,’” Stone said.

That earlier account and the new Variety interview both concern Stone’s experience of being associated with roles that present danger, manipulation or emotional control.

Why the comments matter now

The new remarks arrive more than three decades after Basic Instinct was released.

Stone’s comments indicate that the film remains a reference point in conversations about her public image and career.

Her explanation also frames the reaction in gendered terms, focusing on a woman who presents herself as independent rather than deferential.

Stone did not say that fear was the only response to the performance, and the interview did not quantify how many journalists reacted in that way.

Her wording instead presented the reaction as an enduring association between her and Tramell, the character she portrayed.

The recent coverage has therefore centered on Stone’s own account rather than on a new controversy involving the film.

Her central point was that a fictional portrayal can continue to shape how an actor is perceived long after the production has ended.