InFrame

Madonna Welcomes Streamer Gymskin to London Home After His Viral Dance Sends ‘Into the Groove’ Back Up UK Charts

Photo Credit: Kick/Gymskin

by Chris Tremblay Jun 1

5 MIN READ

Madonna has met British Kick streamer and fitness influencer Gymskin at her London home, months after his viral dance trend helped send her 1985 classic ‘Into the Groove’ back into the upper reaches of the UK singles chart. The encounter capped off a spring in which a short shoulder-drop routine, shared widely on TikTok and Instagram Reels, turned a queer-club staple from the mid‑1980s into one of 2026’s most unexpected viral hits.

The London meeting

On 28 May, Gymskin, whose real name is Jack Smith, spent more than an hour teasing a “surprise” during a live stream before walking through the open door of Madonna’s six‑storey Georgian townhouse in Marylebone, central London. Video clips shared by streaming platform Kick’s official X account show Gymskin entering a ground-floor office space where Madonna sits at a desk, dressed in gym wear with one leg resting casually on the surface.

In the background of the stream, viewers could hear ‘I Feel So Free’, the lead single from Madonna’s forthcoming album Confessions II, which she described during the encounter as the “new ‘Into the Groove’”. The pair then climbed onto the desk together to perform Gymskin’s now-famous shoulder-drop dance that first reignited attention around ‘Into the Groove’ earlier this year.

Kick amplified the crossover moment by posting the clip with the caption “gymskin meets his biggest fan, madonna,” further feeding speculation among fans about the relationship between legacy pop stars and current digital creators. The meeting followed weeks of coverage in music and pop‑culture media about how a short livestream moment had driven both streaming numbers and chart performance for one of Madonna’s most enduring dance tracks.

From “follow that tune” to the charts

The resurgence began when a clip from one of Gymskin’s Kick streams spread across TikTok, showing him walking through the street at night before suddenly hearing Madonna’s ‘Into the Groove’ playing from a nearby venue. Turning to camera, he said the now widely quoted line “Follow that tune” and then dropped his shoulders in time with the music, launching into a playful dance that soon became a repeatable meme.

The trend that followed centred on recreating Gymskin’s shoulder-drop move and lip‑syncing along to the “follow that tune” soundbite, using Madonna’s 1985 single as the backdrop. Within days, the sound was being used by creators across TikTok and Instagram Reels, ranging from everyday users to high‑profile personalities.

British radio and chart outlets reported that the trend had a noticeable impact on streaming numbers, boosting ‘Into the Groove’ on services like Spotify and Apple Music in the UK. The Official Charts Company noted that the song re-entered the UK Singles Chart Top 40 at Number 40, its first Top 40 appearance since the mid‑1980s, before rising further in subsequent weeks.

A 1985 queer‑club staple in 2026

‘Into the Groove’ was originally released in 1985 and quickly became Madonna’s first Number 1 single in the UK, spending several weeks at the top and cementing her reputation as a dance‑pop innovator whose music resonated deeply within LGBTQ+ club culture. The track was associated with her film Desperately Seeking Susan and would go on to be one of her best‑selling singles in the British market.

In early 2026, streaming data showed that the song’s renewed popularity was not limited to nostalgia playlists but driven by a new generation encountering it first through social media, then adding it to their own daily listening. Italian and Brazilian radio outlets highlighted that the track climbed back into the UK Top 20, a milestone it had not reached since September 1985, and entered the Official Streaming Chart for the first time.

Alongside chart successes, commentators pointed out that the resurgence underscores Madonna’s continuing cultural relevance among younger audiences, including many LGBTQ+ listeners who connect with her long history of explicitly supporting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer communities. The viral trend has also reintroduced the song’s distinctive synth‑driven groove and dance‑floor energy to queer nightlife spaces that have historically embraced Madonna as an ally and icon.

Who is Gymskin?

Gymskin is a British fitness influencer and streamer who is particularly active on the platform Kick and has a large presence on TikTok, where he has approximately 1.2 million followers. Under his @kickhub__ handle on TikTok, he posts a mix of casual street streams, coffee reviews, and spontaneous dance moments that have helped build a dedicated audience.

His age has become a minor point of online debate, with various users speculating about whether he is in his early 20s or early 30s, but he has not publicly confirmed any specific number. In interviews cited by chart outlets, Gymskin has described the chart impact of his Madonna dance as “great for her,” calling Madonna “absolutely iconic” and praising her catalogue, language that underscores the respect he communicates toward an artist who has been influential for many LGBTQ+ fans.

Beyond the ‘Into the Groove’ trend, Gymskin is known among followers for his “burnt the bean” coffee reviews, where he humorously critiques how baristas have prepared his drinks while streaming his daily life around British cities. The blend of everyday routines, fitness content and spontaneous dances has positioned him as a recognisable figure in a creator landscape where relatively small moments can generate global pop‑culture ripples.

Celebrity participation and LGBTQ+ pop legacy

As the “follow that tune” sound spread, a range of public figures joined in, further amplifying the reach of both Gymskin’s meme and Madonna’s track. TV personalities Sam Thompson and Pete Wicks recorded their own version, sharing it via the @stayingrelevantpodcast account on TikTok and promising Wicks a pint if he took part, a post that drew over 1.5 million views.

YouTuber and musician KSI incorporated the dance into a post‑match celebration at a Daggers v Dorking football game, while Cruz Beckham, performing with his band Cruz Beckham & The Breakers, also recreated the shoulder‑roll move popularised by Gymskin. Other influencers, including Fin Morse and George Baggs, contributed their own clips, helping to sustain the trend and drive repeated streams of ‘Into the Groove’ on multiple platforms.

Commentary from music outlets has framed the episode as another example of how older songs, many of which have longstanding resonance in LGBTQ+ club spaces, can find renewed commercial success when embraced by contemporary creators. For Madonna, whose work has frequently centred queer aesthetics and who has historically advocated for LGBTQ+ rights, the 2026 revival suggests that her catalogue continues to offer affirming, dance‑floor‑ready soundtracks for new generations.

New music and what comes next

The London meeting also doubled as informal promotion for Madonna’s upcoming album Confessions II, which is set to include 16 tracks and draw on the electronic and dance‑pop sounds that have been central to her artistic identity. Madonna has already released the lead single ‘I Feel So Free’ on 18 April 2026, positioning it as a spiritual successor to ‘Into the Groove’ in the way it is presented within the stream and in media coverage.

A second track, ‘Bring Your Love’, a collaboration with pop artist Sabrina Carpenter, arrived on 30 April following a surprise joint performance at Coachella, expanding the album’s potential reach to younger pop audiences. The full Confessions II album is scheduled for release on 3 July 2026, with a tracklist that includes songs such as ‘Good for the Soul’, ‘Danceteria’, ‘My Sins Are My Saviour’ and ‘Les Girls’, titles that signal an engagement with both nightclub culture and themes of identity and desire that have long resonated with LGBTQ+ listeners.

Streaming platforms like Spotify are already hosting visual teasers for all 16 song titles through flashing graphics, reflecting an integrated digital rollout that is likely to continue intersecting with user‑generated content on TikTok, Instagram and Kick. As Confessions II approaches, the meeting between Madonna and Gymskin stands as a symbol of how established pop icons and emerging streamers can collaborate—formally or informally—to drive renewed visibility for music that has been meaningful to LGBTQ+ communities for decades.

Gayle King Recounts Catching Ex-Husband Cheating With Close Friend, Says She Turned Only to Oprah

Photo Credit: Call Her Daddy

by Chris Tremblay May 28

5 MIN READ

Broadcast journalist Gayle King has gone into rare, granular detail about discovering her ex-husband’s infidelity with one of her close friends, recounting the story in a newly released episode of the Call Her Daddy podcast hosted by Alex Cooper. The conversation, published on May 27, 2026, quickly generated widespread coverage as King described the confrontation, the involvement of police, and how she leaned on Oprah Winfrey in the aftermath.

King, a co-host of CBS Mornings and a long‑time media figure, has previously acknowledged that her marriage ended because of infidelity but had not often described the discovery itself in such vivid terms. In the new interview, she framed the experience as a turning point in both her personal life and her understanding of trust and betrayal in intimate relationships.

The day a canceled flight changed everything

King explained that she discovered the affair on a day when her travel plans unexpectedly changed, leading her to arrive home earlier than her then-husband expected, with their two young children and the nanny in tow. She said her flight had been delayed or canceled, and she did not call ahead to say she was returning early, assuming she would simply walk into a normal day at home.

When King arrived, she immediately noticed that the house alarm was set, which she found unusual because her husband typically did not activate it while he was home alone. She recalled thinking, “That’s strange, you’re in here by yourself,” a small but telling signal that something in the household dynamic had changed.

King recounted that as she entered the home, the alarm sounded and her then-husband, attorney William Bumpus, came “flying” out of the bedroom wearing only a towel, trying to prevent her from going into the room. He reportedly told her that someone was inside and insisted she could not enter, which she said only heightened her suspicion.

Finding a friend “cowering behind the door”

Ignoring his attempts to block her, King said she searched the house until she discovered a woman hiding behind a door, also wrapped in one of King’s towels. She described the woman as “cowering behind the door” in a bath sheet she characterized as a particularly nice towel, underlining the surreal, domestic intimacy of the moment.

King has not publicly named the friend, referring to her as “Casey” in the podcast conversation and noting that the woman was herself married with children who were close to King’s children. The broadcaster said the families were close enough that her children saw the woman as an “aunt,” underscoring how deeply intertwined the two households had become before the affair came to light.

In the interview, King recalled asking the friend how she could be in her house under those circumstances and telling her, “I thought we were friends,” a line she described as “so pitiful” in retrospect. She said the shock of seeing a trusted friend in that position, combined with the presence of her children in the home, intensified the sense of betrayal.

Police, an exit to the train station, and a deeper betrayal

King told Cooper that the incident became chaotic enough that police arrived at the home, responding to the alarm and the disturbance. She recounted that officers recognized her as a public figure, adding a layer of public embarrassment to an already private crisis.

In another detail that has drawn particular attention, King said her then-husband ultimately drove the friend to the train station so she could return to her own husband, whom King called “Richard” for the purpose of the story. She emphasized the irony of being left alone in the house after discovering the infidelity while her spouse ensured the other woman could leave and manage her own marital situation.

King noted that she had previously sensed a subtle shift between her husband and the friend during a social interaction, recalling the way the friend said “Nice shot, Bill” with a look that made her briefly question whether she was imagining tension. She said that when she later confronted her husband about the dynamic, he attempted to “gaslight” her into doubting her instincts, an experience she now interprets as part of a broader pattern of deception.

Confiding only in Oprah Winfrey

Following the confrontation, King said the first and only person she called to share the full story was Oprah Winfrey, with whom she has maintained a close, decades‑long friendship. She described reaching out to Winfrey to vent and process the shock, emphasizing how much she relied on that relationship during one of the most painful periods of her life.

According to King, Winfrey told her that the incident suggested the betrayal had likely been going on longer and more extensively than she realized, encouraging her to acknowledge the full weight of what had occurred. King added that she might not have believed Winfrey if she had voiced those concerns earlier, acknowledging in the podcast that people in painful relationships can sometimes refuse to see warning signs.

King also referenced an “antidote” she said she learned from Winfrey about how some people receive small warnings about difficult truths while others experience major, life‑altering revelations, framing her discovery as one of those dramatic wake‑up calls. She connected that idea to broader patterns of infidelity and denial, noting that ignoring early signs can sometimes lead to more painful exposures later on.

Marriage, divorce, and a later apology

King married Bumpus in 1982, and the couple divorced in 1993 after roughly 11 years of marriage, with King having long said that infidelity was a central reason for the breakup. They share two children, and King has emphasized in past interviews that she worked through the emotional fallout over time and does not identify as bitter about the experience.

In 2016, Bumpus issued a public statement apologizing to King after she referenced the woman she caught him with in a Vanity Fair interview, though that earlier apology has been re‑contextualized in light of the current media attention. More recently, Bumpus has again apologized through a statement reported this week, acknowledging his infidelity and expressing regret for the pain he caused.

In the new reporting, Bumpus is quoted as saying he has nothing but the “utmost respect” for King and that he has long felt remorseful for the betrayal, which occurred nearly four decades ago. King, in turn, has focused publicly on how she rebuilt her life and career afterward rather than dwelling on the specifics of his statements.

Addressing rumors and affirming identities

During the Call Her Daddy appearance, King also addressed long‑running speculation that she and Winfrey are in a romantic relationship, a rumor that has circulated for years and has often been framed through stigmatizing commentary about LGBTQ+ people. She reiterated that their connection is a deep friendship rather than a romantic partnership, pushing back on assumptions about their relationship while affirming the validity of same‑gender relationships more broadly.

The episode’s release has prompted renewed discussion in entertainment and social media spaces about how public figures’ friendships, especially between women, are often sexualized or mischaracterized, including in ways that can both reinforce stereotypes and, at times, dismiss the real experiences of lesbian and bisexual women. Coverage has also intersected with ongoing conversations about betrayal within close-knit communities and how people—of all genders and orientations—seek support after intimate partner violence, infidelity, or emotional harm.

King’s decision to revisit the story now, decades after the events and years into a high‑profile career, positions her narrative alongside a wider cultural trend of people using podcasts and long‑form interviews to share complex personal histories on their own terms. The reaction underscores how stories of betrayal, trust, and healing can resonate across audiences, including LGBTQ+ listeners who may identify with the themes of secrecy, stigma, and the search for chosen family support, even when the relationships at the center of the story are not themselves queer.

Perrie Edwards Recalls Little Mix Risking Arrest in Dubai After Pride Flag Performance: ‘Let Them Try’

LONDON, ENGLAND - DECEMBER 04: Perrie Edwards attends The National Lottery New Year's Eve Big Bash 2024 at OVO Arena Wembley on December 04, 2024 in London, England. Photo Credit: Jeff Spicer

by Chris Tremblay May 29

5 MIN READ

In late May 2026, English singer Perrie Edwards described how Little Mix believed they might be arrested in Dubai after choosing to perform with a Pride flag on screen in a country where same-sex relationships and overt LGBTQ+ expression are criminalised. Edwards spoke about the episode in an interview ahead of her solo appearance at London festival Mighty Hoopla, recalling the tension among the group’s team and the possibility of repercussions as they travelled through the airport after the show.

The comments refer back to a 2019 concert at Dubai Media City Amphitheatre, where Little Mix performed their ballad “Secret Love Song” as a large rainbow Pride flag filled the stage screens. At the time, local and international outlets noted that the performance took place in the United Arab Emirates, where same-sex sexual conduct can be punished with imprisonment and where public promotion of LGBTQ+ identities is heavily restricted.

‘Let them try’: Edwards on airport fears

Speaking to LGBTQ+ magazine Attitude, Edwards said she clearly remembers the concern surrounding the Dubai show and its aftermath. “I remember our team stressing and everything like that,” she recalled, explaining that staff warned the band there could be trouble when they tried to leave the country following the performance with the Pride imagery.

Edwards said there were specific worries about being stopped at the airport, but that the group responded defiantly. “When we got to the airport, I think it was our team at the time were scared we were going to get pulled at the airport,” she told the magazine, adding that the band’s attitude was: “Oh well, let them try.”

Edwards described the decision to go ahead with the Pride flag as deliberate, even after being warned about the UAE’s stance on LGBTQ+ rights. “At the end of the day we did it because we wanted to do it, and it means so much to our fans,” she said, framing the moment as an act of solidarity with LGBTQ+ listeners who have long embraced the group’s music.

A long-standing LGBTQ+ anthem in a hostile legal landscape

Little Mix performed in Dubai on 23 March 2019 as part of The Assembly: A Global Teacher Prize Concert, sharing the bill with artists including Rita Ora and Liam Payne. During “Secret Love Song,” widely understood as an anthem for people in same-gender or otherwise marginalised relationships, the group performed under a giant rainbow flag projected across the stage screens.

Homosexuality is illegal in the United Arab Emirates, and in Dubai consensual same-sex acts can carry prison sentences, fines and other penalties under a combination of federal and emirate-level laws. Reporting around the time of the concert highlighted that promoting LGBTQ+ symbols or imagery, such as the rainbow Pride flag, can also attract scrutiny from authorities in the country.

Fans and commentators described the moment as unusually bold for a mainstream pop act performing in the Gulf. Social media clips circulated widely at the time, with posts pointing out that the group were performing a song interpreted as a queer love ballad under a Pride flag in a jurisdiction where being openly LGBTQ+ can result in imprisonment.

Previous accounts from Jade Thirlwall and ongoing allyship

Edwards’ fresh comments echo earlier descriptions by bandmate Jade Thirlwall, who has previously written about fearing arrest after the same Dubai performance. In an essay on LGBTQ+ allyship for UK newspaper Metro, Thirlwall said the group had been repeatedly told to “abide by the rules,” including not promoting anything “LGBT+ or too female-empowering,” before deciding they would either stay home or “go and make a point.”

Thirlwall wrote that during “Secret Love Song,” the band performed with the LGBTQ+ flag “taking up the whole screen behind us,” and later received “so many positive tweets and messages from the community.” She said that lying awake in their hotel rooms “s**tting ourselves that we’d get arrested that night” felt worth it after seeing the response from LGBTQ+ fans.

The group’s history of LGBTQ+ allyship predates the Dubai concert, including marching at Manchester Pride and explicitly embracing “Secret Love Song” as a queer anthem dedicated to people in relationships that are hidden or marginalised. Thirlwall and her bandmates have previously stated that their LGBTQ+ supporters are central to their career, and have used tour stops and public appearances to send affirming messages, including dedicating performances to victims of anti-LGBTQ+ violence such as the Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting.

‘A two-way street’ with LGBTQ+ fans

In her new interview, Edwards emphasised that the Pride flag decision reflected Little Mix’s relationship with LGBTQ+ fans rather than a one-off gesture. She described these fans as “such a core fanbase for so many years” and characterised the connection as “a two-way street” in which the group and their supporters “go above and beyond” for each other.

Edwards said the Dubai moment “meant so much to so many people at the time,” adding that if it had led to trouble with authorities, “then so be it,” because Little Mix “didn’t really care about that.” She framed the group’s priority as doing “everything for our fans and for the people that support us,” reinforcing how central LGBTQ+ listeners remain to their public identity even as members focus on solo projects.

In the Attitude interview, Edwards also discussed raising her child in a climate where she wants young people to “be anything you want to be, love who you want to love,” tying her parenting values to broader ideas of acceptance and self-determination. That stance aligns with Little Mix’s public messaging over the years, in which the band has often encouraged fans to embrace their identities and relationships, including LGBTQ+ identities that face legal and social barriers in many parts of the world.

Ongoing resonance of the Dubai performance

Edwards’ recollection comes as she prepares for solo performances and as fans continue to discuss the possibility of a future Little Mix reunion. In the same Attitude interview, she confirmed that the three current members have been in talks about performing together again, though no specific timeline or format has been formally announced.

For many LGBTQ+ fans, the Dubai performance is remembered as an instance of high-profile artists using a global stage to centre a community often forced into invisibility, particularly in regions with restrictive laws. By revisiting the experience in 2026 and underlining the calculated risk the group believed they were taking, Edwards has renewed public attention on how entertainers navigate the tension between local laws and commitments to LGBTQ+ inclusion.

Her account also highlights how LGBTQ+ fans, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people in countries with restrictive laws, often look to global artists and tours for visible affirmation that their identities and relationships are valid. Edwards’ framing of the Dubai Pride flag moment as “worth it” for the people it reached underscores how acts of visibility by mainstream performers can resonate far beyond a single night’s show.

Paris Jackson Calls Past Addiction Behavior ‘Really Ugly’ as She Marks Six Years Sober

BARCELONA, SPAIN - JUNE 06: Paris Jackson attends the photocall of the Desigual Fashion Show on June 06, 2024 in Barcelona, Spain.Photo Credit: Xavi Torrent

by Chris Tremblay May 29

4 MIN READ

Paris Jackson is offering one of her most candid accounts yet of how addiction reshaped her sense of self, saying that when she was using drugs and alcohol, “the behavior is really ugly” and at odds with the values of kindness that guided her upbringing. Speaking on Jack Osbourne’s “Trying Not to Die” podcast, the 28‑year‑old daughter of the late Michael Jackson described how alcohol in particular stripped away her moral compass, turning her into what she called a “very vindictive person.”

Background and Context

Jackson has been in the public eye since childhood and has spoken in previous years about living with depression, self‑harm, and substance use, including past suicide attempts as a teenager. In 2017 interviews, she discussed using drugs in her mid‑teens and covering track marks and self‑harm scars with tattoos, framing that period as one marked by what she called “self-hatred” and feeling unworthy of living.

In January 2025, Jackson publicly marked five years of sobriety from alcohol and drugs, sharing that she identified as “an alcoholic and a heroin addict” while emphasizing that sobriety allowed her to “show up” for life in ways she could not previously. Earlier this year, she used social media to reflect on how getting sober did not instantly make life easy, describing in a reel that a few years into recovery, things became “very, very, very hard” and that she had to learn to live “on life’s terms.”

‘Really Ugly’ Behavior and Moral Conflict

In the “Trying Not to Die” conversation, released the week of May 26, Jackson drew a sharp line between the values she was taught and the way she behaved while actively using. “The behavior is really ugly,” she said, stressing that the ugliness was “in a moral way, because I was raised to be kind,” not merely “nice.” She described kindness as looking people in the eye and learning a server’s name so she could write it on the receipt, using small acts of consideration as examples of the standard she felt she failed to meet while drinking.

Jackson recalled thinking of herself as “a liar, a cheater, a piece of s---, a thief,” but even in that harsh self‑assessment, she believed she retained some moral grounding from her upbringing. She said that when she drank, that remaining moral compass “goes away” and “goes right out the window,” adding that under the influence, she became “a very vindictive person.”

She linked that shift in behavior to what she recognized as a broader pattern among people living with addiction, describing an “overall reachy, graspy energy” that she now says she sees in other addicts as well. “Reaching for something outside of yourself,” she said, framing that grasping quality as both a symptom of addiction and a source of harm to herself and others.

Treatment, Relapse, and Six Years of Sobriety

Jackson stated that she has been through treatment “several times,” both before and after the point at which she began her current stretch of sobriety. She said she first sought professional help around age 17, noting that she had already been struggling with self‑harm and complicated relationships with food before she ever had a drink or used drugs.

In the interview, she described her addiction as unfolding against a backdrop of “years and years and years of self-hatred,” echoing earlier public comments about long‑term depression and trauma. She confirmed in the podcast and in previous social media posts that she has now been sober for about six years, having celebrated that milestone in early 2026 with an Instagram reel showing moments from everyday life, including time with friends and nature.

Jackson has previously compared getting sober to being in a car accident, saying that “everything I shoved in the back seat moved forward on impact,” and that she is still learning to navigate life without the coping mechanisms she once relied on. In January 2026, she told followers that sobriety did not erase the “very, very, very hard” aspects of living with treatment‑resistant major depressive disorder, obsessive‑compulsive disorder , and complex post‑traumatic stress disorder , conditions she said she continues to manage alongside her recovery.

Public Conversation on Addiction and Stigma

Jackson’s latest remarks join a growing number of celebrity accounts that frame addiction as a chronic health condition intertwined with mental health, rather than a simple failure of willpower. By naming behaviors she now regards as harmful without labeling her past self solely as “bad,” her comments fit into a broader public health approach that emphasizes accountability, treatment, and long‑term recovery support.

Her acknowledgment of “reachy, graspy” behavior toward people and substances also resonates with how many addiction specialists describe the condition—as a persistent drive to seek relief or reward outside oneself, often at severe personal and relational cost. While Jackson did not position herself as a spokesperson for any formal recovery movement, her willingness to describe both her actions and her ongoing mental health diagnoses may contribute to more open discussion about seeking help, especially among young adults and LGBTQ+ people in entertainment who see aspects of their own experiences reflected in such narratives.

Looking Ahead in Public and Private Life

Beyond discussing her addiction history, Jackson continues to pursue her work as a musician and actor, appearing on programs such as “The Morning Show” and promoting her projects while maintaining what she has described as a substance‑free lifestyle. In recent appearances, she has emphasized simple routines—time in nature, creative work, and moments with friends—as part of how she supports her recovery day to day.

Her “Trying Not to Die” interview adds another layer to that public narrative, underlining that the work of staying sober includes confronting painful memories of how she treated others. By labeling her past behavior as “really ugly” while also recognizing the conditions that shaped it, Jackson positions her story as an evolving account of harm, repair, and ongoing recovery, rather than a closed chapter.

Maluma Says Panic Attacks After 14 Years on Tour ‘Changed My Life’ as He Steps Back to Heal

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA - MAY 25: Maluma performs onstage during the 52nd American Music Awards at MGM Grand Garden Arena on May 25, 2026 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Photo Credit: Ethan Miller

by Chris Tremblay May 29

4 MIN READ

In a recent series of interviews, Colombian singer Maluma has spoken publicly about experiencing panic attacks for the first time after nearly 14 years of almost continuous touring, describing the episodes as a turning point that “changed my life.” Appearing on “The Jennifer Hudson Show,” he explained that the combination of becoming a father, nonstop travel, and mounting expectations led him to step back from touring and focus on mental health, therapy, and more intentional living.

A Turning Point After Years on the Road

Maluma, whose birth name is Juan Luis Londoño, has built his career on global tours and high-profile performances, often spending much of the year on the road. In his recent comments, he said he had been “touring for almost 14 years in a row,” emphasizing that he rarely took substantial breaks during that time.

On “The Jennifer Hudson Show,” the artist said that despite outward success, the pace eventually became unsustainable. He explained that he made a deliberate decision to stop touring so he could “pay attention” and “try to find myself again,” linking that decision directly to the period around the birth of his daughter, Paris.

Panic Attacks That ‘Changed My Life’

In interviews and televised segments, Maluma has said that at the end of 2024 he began to feel panic attacks and anxiety symptoms that he had never experienced before. Spanish-language coverage of his comments quotes him saying, “A finales de 2024, comencé a sentir ataques de pánico, algo que nunca había tenido antes,” and noting that this “realmente cambió mi vida.”

He has described those panic attacks as a major red flag that forced him to reconsider how he was working and living. In the televised conversation with Jennifer Hudson, he explained that the panic attacks emerged after he decided to take a step back from touring and focus more on family, suggesting that the change in pace surfaced stress and exhaustion that had accumulated over years.

Fatherhood, Grief, and Growing Pressure

Maluma became a father in 2024, welcoming his daughter Paris with his partner Susana Gómez, a life change he says deeply affected his priorities. In his comments on the show, he connected the birth of his daughter to a desire to work “harder and harder,” which he said ultimately contributed to burnout and heightened anxiety.

The Jennifer Hudson segment also references the loss of a close friend, which Maluma said taught him the importance of living fully in the present. He framed that grief, combined with the responsibilities of parenthood and a demanding career, as part of the emotional context in which he eventually experienced panic attacks and chose to reassess his life.

Spanish-language outlets covering his recent appearances note that he has previously spoken about mental health challenges, including anxiety and depression, particularly after family losses. These reports describe him taking temporary breaks from social media and reconsidering aspects of his lifestyle, signaling an evolving openness about mental health long before his latest comments about panic attacks.

Therapy, Music, and a New Project

Maluma has emphasized that professional therapy and creative work were central to his recovery from panic attacks. In Spanish-language interviews summarizing his television appearance, he is quoted saying, “Empecé a hacer mucha terapia, y mi sanación estuvo en mi música,” describing how he used both mental health care and songwriting as tools to heal.

The artist has said he has been working on a new musical project for almost two years, calling it the “deepest part” of his soul and heart. In the same coverage, he notes that the project honors his grandparents, his culture, and his home city in Colombia, suggesting a more introspective approach to his artistry following his mental health challenges.

Reports indicate that his upcoming or recently released album “Loco X Volver” is tied to this period of reflection and recovery, with the project arriving in mid-May 2026. In interviews, Maluma describes the album as his most personal work to date, shaped by his experiences with therapy, fatherhood, and stepping away from long-running touring commitments.

Feeling ‘Amazing’ and Free of Panic Attacks

In his recent comments, Maluma has been clear that he no longer experiences panic attacks, attributing that improvement to therapy and changes in his lifestyle and work. Spanish-language radio coverage quotes him saying he feels “bastante bien ahora,” adding that he does not have panic attacks anymore and is excited about the current stage of his career.

The singer characterizes this moment as a “good season,” saying he is enjoying life and looking forward to sharing a more authentic version of himself with the public. He has said that listeners will get to know “Juan Luis,” the person behind the stage name, emphasizing vulnerability and honesty as he emerges from the period marked by panic attacks and intense self-reflection.

Mental Health Visibility in Pop Music

Maluma’s decision to speak openly about panic attacks continues a broader trend of major artists discussing mental health challenges, including anxiety, depression, and burnout. While each person’s experience is specific, his account aligns with research and testimony showing that high-pressure industries, including entertainment, can increase stress and risk of mental health symptoms.

Coverage of his comments does not mention specific LGBTQ+ themes, but advocates often note that increased visibility around mental health in mainstream pop culture can help reduce stigma for many communities, including LGBTQ+ people who already face higher rates of discrimination and stress. By naming panic attacks directly and describing therapy in pragmatic terms, Maluma adds a high-profile voice to ongoing conversations about mental health access and care in Latin American and global entertainment contexts.

‘Summer House’ Star KJ Dillard Reveals Post-Season Hospitalization and Borderline Personality Disorder Diagnosis

Photo Credit: Bravo

by Chris Tremblay May 29

5 MIN READ

During the first part of the “Summer House” season 10 reunion, which aired on Tuesday, May 26, 2026, cast member KJ Dillard shared that he was hospitalized for self-harm after the season finished filming. Speaking to host Andy Cohen, the 28-year-old reality personality described the period after production ended as a time when he was “going through some heavy stuff mentally,” framing his disclosure as part of an ongoing conversation about mental health rather than a dramatic twist.

Dillard told Cohen and viewers that he “had to go to the hospital for self-harm” and remained there for about a week, becoming visibly emotional as he recounted the experience. As he spoke, fellow cast member Jesse Solomon stepped forward to embrace him, underscoring the emotional weight of the moment on set and the broader human stakes behind the reunion spectacle.

Hospital stay and diagnosis

During his week-long hospitalization, clinicians diagnosed Dillard with borderline personality disorder , a mental health condition characterized by instability in relationships, self-image, and emotions along with marked impulsivity. Borderline personality disorder is typically diagnosed following a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation that examines identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy, as well as traits such as emotional lability, anxiousness, impulsivity, and risk-taking.

Clinical guidance notes that personality disorders like BPD are usually diagnosed in adults and require careful differentiation from other conditions such as mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use, or acute medical issues that can mimic similar symptoms. Evaluations often involve in-depth interviews, standardized assessments, personal history, and when possible, accounts from people close to the individual to ensure that the diagnosis reflects persistent patterns rather than temporary stress reactions.

Support from castmates and path to recovery

Dillard emphasized that his fellow “Summer House” cast members Ciara Miller and Mia Calabrese were by his side throughout his hospital stay, saying they were there “almost every day” as he navigated the crisis and early recovery. He also shared that he spent several months in recovery following his hospitalization, describing that time as a needed reset to concentrate on healing and personal growth.

Reflecting on his journey, Dillard said he realized he had often distracted himself and avoided confronting his issues, and that he is now in therapy and taking medication as part of his ongoing mental health care. He expressed gratitude for having come through the crisis and underscored the importance of focusing on his own well-being, telling viewers, “I’ve got to focus on myself. I needed that.”

KJ Dillard’s background and prior disclosures

Before joining “Summer House,” Dillard was known as a professional skateboarder who later moved into modeling and music, a trajectory he discussed in a long-form interview earlier this year. In that conversation, he spoke about living with anxiety, depression, and borderline personality disorder, as well as the role therapy and medication have played in his life, indicating that mental health has been an ongoing part of his story rather than a new development.

A February 2026 profile noted that Dillard joined “Summer House” for season 10 and highlighted earlier social media disclosures about his mental health, including a November 2025 Instagram post in which he shared his borderline personality disorder diagnosis alongside experiences with anxiety, ADHD, and OCD. This context positions his reunion remarks as a continuation of his public openness around mental health, now amplified by the visibility of a network reality series and a primetime reunion stage.

Understanding borderline personality disorder and self-harm risk

Borderline personality disorder is associated with intense and rapidly shifting emotions, unstable interpersonal relationships, and difficulties with self-image, all of which can contribute to self-harm and suicidal thoughts for some people. Clinical guidelines note that while many people with BPD eventually no longer meet full diagnostic criteria over time, a subset continue to experience significant symptoms that can affect daily functioning and safety.

Psychotherapy is the main recommended treatment for BPD, with approaches such as dialectical behavior therapy and other structured modalities focusing on emotion regulation, distress tolerance, and relationship skills, while medication may be used to address specific co-occurring symptoms like depression or anxiety. In situations where safety is a concern, including active self-harm or suicidal behavior, short-term hospitalization is a standard intervention to provide stabilization, assessment, and a structured environment for immediate care.

Reality TV, mental health, and public disclosure

Dillard’s decision to discuss self-harm and a BPD diagnosis on camera aligns with a broader trend of reality television participants speaking publicly about mental health, though each person’s circumstances and motivations are distinct. Commentators following “Summer House” have highlighted how the reunion format, which often centers conflict and “receipts,” can also offer a platform for more vulnerable disclosures when participants feel supported and in control of their narratives.

For LGBTQ+ viewers and others living with mental health conditions, seeing a reality personality speak plainly about a recent crisis, hospitalization, and ongoing care may contribute to reducing stigma, even as individual experiences with BPD and self-harm vary widely. Advocacy organizations and clinicians often encourage person-first language—such as referring to “people living with borderline personality disorder”—to emphasize that a diagnosis does not define a person’s full identity or potential.

On-air tensions and later reconciliation

Dillard’s mental health disclosure comes in the wider context of a tense season and reunion, including conflict with fellow cast member West Wilson that extended into their social circles and fan commentary. Earlier in May, Dillard appeared on “Watch What Happens Live With Andy Cohen,” where he revealed that West had texted him an apology the day after the reunion taping, a message he had not opened for days before reading it on air.

Coverage of that appearance noted that Dillard read out portions of the apology text, which referenced West’s regret over how their dynamic played out during the season, adding another layer to public understanding of the cast’s off-camera relationships and emotional landscape. While the apology segment focused on interpersonal conflict rather than mental health directly, it forms part of the broader narrative about how reality television participants navigate harm, accountability, and reconciliation in front of an audience.

Implications for mental health conversations in entertainment

Mental health professionals emphasize that when public figures describe hospitalizations for self-harm, it can be important to pair those stories with information about treatment, support, and recovery to avoid glamorizing crisis while acknowledging the seriousness of the experience. Dillard’s comments about being in therapy, taking medication, and recognizing patterns of avoidance in his past behavior illustrate several elements commonly highlighted in evidence-based care: self-reflection, structured support, and willingness to engage with treatment.

Guidelines for reporting on self-harm and suicide risk encourage media outlets to avoid detailed descriptions of methods while providing context, resources, and language that centers people’s dignity and capacity for recovery. Within that framework, Dillard’s choice to frame his hospitalization and diagnosis as part of an ongoing process—rather than a definitive endpoint—mirrors clinical recognition that borderline personality disorder is treatable and that many people see their symptoms lessen or become more manageable with sustained support.

Derek Hough Recounts “Extreme” Childhood Bullying, from Beatings to Being Held at Gunpoint

Photo Credit: Disney/ABC

by Chris Tremblay May 28

5 MIN READ

“Dancing with the Stars” judge Derek Hough has shared stark details of what he describes as “severe” and “extreme” bullying in his childhood, saying peers and neighborhood kids beat him, hogtied him, hung him upside down from a tree, spat on him and at one point held a gun to his head. Hough, now 41, revisited those memories in a May 25 episode of “The Bossticks” podcast, describing long‑lasting trauma including night terrors, bed‑wetting and intense fear of the dark.

Hough’s comments add new detail to experiences he has referenced in earlier interviews and social media posts about being targeted as a sensitive, dance‑focused kid, underscoring the enduring impact of physical and psychological violence on children. While Hough did not frame the abuse in terms of sexuality or gender, his account speaks to broader concerns from advocates that boys perceived as non‑conforming or insufficiently “masculine” often become targets for especially severe bullying.

The podcast account of violence

In the new interview on “The Bossticks,” hosted by Lauryn Bosstick, Hough said he was “a young little scrawny little kid” who already felt vulnerable when bullying at school escalated into serious physical attacks. He recalled one incident in which another student punched him in the face so hard that he was “bleeding everywhere,” saying that when he finally fought back, he ended up being the one expelled from school.

Beyond the schoolyard, Hough said the most serious harm came from older neighborhood kids near his home in Utah, who he alleges “tormented” him and his family. According to summaries of the podcast, he told Bosstick that these neighbors hung him from a tree by his ankles, spit on him, hogtied him in a field and at times pressed a gun to his head, describing the experience as terrifying.

TMZ’s account of the interview notes that Hough characterized the treatment as more than typical bullying, with a group of boys allegedly jumping him because a girl liked him and repeatedly subjecting him to degrading acts. Outlets owned by Sinclair, including The National Desk and local affiliates, carried nearly identical summaries, emphasizing his description of being tied up, hung upside down and threatened with a gun as a child.

Long‑term trauma and fear

Hough said the violence and intimidation did not end when he went home, explaining that he developed night terrors that lasted for years and frequently wet the bed as a direct result of his fear. He added that ordinary childhood experiences, such as sleepovers at friends’ homes, became so overwhelming that he often called his mother to pick him up early because he was too scared to stay.

These new details closely mirror a story Hough shared in a 2025 video interview titled “Millions Watched Me Dance — No One Saw My Trauma,” where he described being tied by his ankles, hung from a tree, spat on and having what he believed was a gun pressed to his head by neighborhood boys, saying he thought he might die. In earlier comments, he has referred to this period as a form of “physical and emotional torture,” framing the experiences as a significant part of his personal history rather than isolated incidents.

Mental health organizations note that survivors of severe childhood bullying and abuse often experience bed‑wetting, sleep disturbances, hypervigilance and difficulties in social settings, especially when environments like sleepovers take them away from perceived sources of safety. Hough’s narrative fits patterns described in research, where children subjected to ongoing threats or violence may show trauma‑related symptoms even long after the abuse stops.

From Utah childhood to dance refuge

Hough has previously said that he grew up in Utah and that dance became a refuge from bullying, particularly after he moved to London in early adolescence to train with acclaimed ballroom coaches. In the new coverage of his “Bossticks” appearance, outlets report that he again linked his eventual relocation to the chance to escape an unsafe environment and find a community that valued his artistry.

In previous interviews, including an America’s Got Talent‑affiliated podcast, Hough has described neighbors tying him up by the ankles, hanging him in a tree and hogtying him in a field “for hours,” explaining that adults later helped him process how extreme those experiences really were. These older conversations align with his recent remarks, suggesting a consistent account of the bullying and its severity over several years.

Hough has also spoken about how dance provided structure, discipline and a sense of belonging that helped him rebuild confidence after the abuse. While the latest reports focus primarily on the violence he endured, they sit within a longer story he has told about finding resilience and purpose in performance.

Bullying in a broader context

Although Hough’s recent comments centered on his personal past, they come amid sustained alarm from educators and advocates about the impact of bullying on children who are seen as different because of their interests, gender expression, disability, race, or perceived sexuality. The Trevor Project reports that LGBTQ+ young people are more likely than their non‑LGBTQ+ peers to report being bullied at school or online, and that bullying is associated with higher rates of anxiety, depression and self‑harm among these youth.

In prior statements, Hough has linked his experiences to a wider concern about how bullying has evolved in the era of social media, noting in a 2025 Instagram video that he saw parallels between the “physical and emotional torture” he endured as a child and the emotional harm some young people now experience in digital spaces. Anti‑bullying groups stress that violence should never be dismissed as “kids being kids,” calling for schools, families and communities to take reports seriously, support survivors and address the biases that can make children who don’t fit rigid gender or behavior norms especially vulnerable.

Hough has not publicly tied his own abuse to sexual orientation or gender identity, but his story resonates with accounts from many young people—including LGBTQ+ youth—who describe being targeted for dancing, creative interests or perceived non‑conformity to traditional masculinity. Advocates say that when public figures speak openly about these experiences, it can help reduce stigma, validate survivors and encourage more comprehensive approaches to safety in schools and neighborhoods.

Continuing conversation and public response

Coverage of Hough’s podcast appearance has sparked renewed online discussion about where the line lies between bullying and abuse, with many commentators describing the alleged conduct in his story as closer to assault and torture than to typical peer conflict. While the latest reports do not quote Hough offering policy prescriptions, advocates often emphasize prevention strategies such as clear anti‑bullying policies, bystander intervention training, trauma‑informed counseling and affirming school climates for all students, including LGBTQ+ youth.

For now, Hough’s detailed recollections place the focus squarely on the lived reality of a child who says he was routinely threatened and humiliated, even as he later became an internationally recognized dancer and television personality. Mental health professionals encourage survivors of similar experiences—regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation—to seek support from trusted adults, clinicians or helplines, noting that healing is possible and that abuse is never the fault of the person who was harmed.

Kyle Cooke Slams “Fake Wedding” Conspiracy, Affirms Amanda Batula Marriage Is Real

Photo Credit: Bravo

by Chris Tremblay May 28

5 MIN READ

In late May 2026, speculation on social media intensified around whether Kyle Cooke and Amanda Batula had ever legally married, reviving a long‑running fan conspiracy that their 2021 wedding was staged solely for Summer House. The renewed chatter followed months of public interest in the couple’s January 2026 separation and their continued appearances together at Bravo events despite confirming they had parted ways as a couple.

The rumor gained fresh traction when a Threads user questioned whether Cooke and Batula had ever filed legal paperwork, implying their on‑screen ceremony might have been purely performative. Posts suggesting the couple engineered a “TV‑only” marriage as a storyline circulated alongside broader fan theories about the authenticity of their relationship arc on the series.

Cooke’s sarcastic but direct denial

Responding on Meta’s Threads platform, Cooke dismissed the conspiracy with a pointedly sarcastic message that underscored his frustration with the narrative. “You got me. I’m an actor and faked a $200k wedding in front of my entire family, friends, and the world,” he wrote, mocking the idea that the ceremony had been fabricated.

In the same post, he joked that he was “the only actor with a MBA, a SBA loan, 2 businesses, and an acquired set of skills” that let him remember “scripted lines” while intoxicated, emphasizing the implausibility of orchestrating a fake marriage of that scale. Cooke ended the message by calling himself a “jack of all trades,” leaning into the absurdity of the theory while also making clear that he viewed the accusations as detached from reality.

While the tone of the Threads post was heavily tongue‑in‑cheek, it also functioned as a direct rejection of claims that the wedding lacked legal or emotional legitimacy. Cosmopolitan summarized his response with the blunt clarification that the couple “are” married, while noting that they remain separated as of spring 2026.

Separation, support, and the “fake” narrative

The renewed focus on whether the marriage was genuine comes against the backdrop of Cooke and Batula’s joint announcement in January 2026 that they had decided to separate after four years of marriage. In a shared Instagram statement, they described the decision as mutual and amicable, asking for kindness and privacy as they worked on personal growth and healing, while acknowledging the irony of that request given how publicly their relationship had unfolded on television.

Attention intensified again in May 2026 when Cooke and Batula were photographed together at the New York premiere of Bravo’s new spin‑off series In the City, prompting some fans to question whether their separation was itself staged. Commentators on social platforms suggested that posing together on the red carpet undermined their earlier announcement, and some alleged the split might have been orchestrated as a publicity storyline.

In an Instagram Stories video, Cooke responded sharply to those claims, saying he had simply been “happy that she showed up” at an event for a show in which she appears. He stressed that he had personally convinced Batula to attend despite her reluctance, then criticized detractors: “Don’t call my life, my relationship, my marriage and my implosion of a marriage ‘fake’,” adding, “Grow the f**k up.”

Legal and emotional stakes behind a televised wedding

Cooke and Batula’s wedding was filmed for the Season 6 finale of Summer House and took place in September 2021 in the backyard of Batula’s parents in Hillsborough, New Jersey, after prior postponements related to COVID‑19. Coverage at the time and subsequent wedding‑focused features emphasized the presence of their families and friends, as well as the hybrid reality‑TV and private‑event nature of the ceremony.

Although legal documents related to the marriage are not publicly cited in recent reporting, multiple outlets continue to refer to Cooke and Batula as having been married for four years at the time they announced their separation in 2026. That consistent framing, combined with Cooke’s on‑record frustration at suggestions the union was fabricated, underpins the mainstream media characterization of the marriage as real rather than a purely scripted device.

The couple’s financial entanglements have also kept questions about the seriousness of their marriage in the public eye, particularly around Loverboy, the beverage company Cooke founded and in which Batula has a stake. In a March 2026 interview on the Trading Secrets podcast, Batula explained that they did not sign a prenuptial agreement before their 2021 wedding and addressed speculation that she would “take half” of Loverboy in a potential divorce, pushing back on online narratives about her financial motives.

Social‑media conspiracies and reality‑TV scrutiny

The “fake wedding” theory is part of a broader pattern in reality‑TV fandom, where viewers sometimes question whether televised relationships and life events are authentic or exaggerated for drama. In Summer House, Cooke and Batula’s relationship has been extensively documented, including conflicts over finances, party culture, and trust, which has made their marriage a recurring point of debate among fans and commentators.

Cooke has acknowledged that public scrutiny can compound the strain on a relationship already under pressure, telling Bravo’s The Daily Dish in January that navigating a split while filming and managing shared business interests was “very unfortunate” but something he was trying to approach without grudges. That dynamic has only intensified as online theories have shifted from questioning fidelity and finances to questioning whether the marriage itself was ever real, a leap Cooke has repeatedly labeled as disrespectful to both their history and their ongoing emotional process.

Recent reporting also outlines how overlapping narratives—such as Batula’s emerging relationship with fellow Bravo personality West Wilson—have added fuel to fan speculation. Wilson has stated that he waited until Batula was separated from Cooke before they began exploring a romantic connection and emphasized there was “no overlap,” directly challenging theories that their timelines undermined the sincerity of her marriage.

A reality‑TV couple asking for real‑world grace

As Cooke rebuts claims of a staged wedding, both he and Batula continue to present their separation as a difficult but genuine life transition rather than a calculated storyline. Their January statement expressed gratitude for the support they have received while underscoring that, despite years of sharing their relationship publicly, they still hope for privacy and respect as they navigate what they described as their “next chapter.”

Cooke’s recent social‑media replies echo that message but with a sharper edge, making clear that debates about editing or story arcs cross a line for him when they turn into accusations that his marriage and its breakdown were manufactured. As the Summer House franchise continues to evolve, the couple’s experience illustrates the tension between the public’s appetite for behind‑the‑scenes insight and the desire of reality‑TV figures—queer or straight, cisgender or transgender, and across all identities—to have their intimate relationships treated as more than just content.

Dermot Mulroney Confirms ‘The Families Stone’ Sequel, Says Original Cast Is Ready to Return

Photo Credit: Fox

by Chris Tremblay May 28

5 MIN READ

Dermot Mulroney has confirmed that a sequel to the 2005 ensemble holiday film The Family Stone is officially in development, nearly two decades after the original movie’s release. Speaking on The Tangle With Kyle Ridley podcast, the actor said he believes the new film will be titled The Families Stone, a name that nods both to the original and to the evolving dynamics of the fictional Stone clan.

Mulroney, who played eldest son Everett Stone in the original movie, told the podcast, “I think it’s going to be entitled The Families Stone,” making one of the first on‑the‑record references to a concrete title for the follow‑up. Multiple entertainment outlets, including TV Insider, Parade, and international publications, have reported that this is the title currently associated with the project, though no studio has formally announced it in a press release.

Cast Ready for a Stone Reunion

In the same podcast conversation, Mulroney said that “everyone’s up for returning,” indicating that many original cast members are interested in reprising their roles if schedules and contracts align. He specifically named Rachel McAdams, Luke Wilson, and Craig T. Nelson among those he says are prepared to come back to the franchise.

Reports summarizing Mulroney’s remarks emphasize that the actor spoke enthusiastically about the ensemble, saying he could “be on record” that people were eager to return. The original film’s cast also includes Sarah Jessica Parker, Claire Danes, Elizabeth Reaser, Tyrone Giordano, Brian J. White, and Paul Schneider, and coverage notes that many of these actors have previously expressed openness to revisiting the story, even though formal casting announcements have not yet been made.

Honoring Diane Keaton’s Legacy

The sequel has taken shape in the shadow of Diane Keaton’s death in October 2025 at the age of 79, an event that deeply affected the creative team and fans of the original film. Keaton played Sybil Stone, the emotionally complex matriarch whose cancer diagnosis and relationships anchor the original story’s exploration of grief, love, and family connection.

Writer‑director Thomas Bezucha has previously said that working on a sequel is, in part, a way to honor Keaton and the character she created. In comments quoted by Parade and earlier interviews, Bezucha described feeling “haunted by the loss of Sybil” and said that Keaton’s passing intensified his drive to finish the script while remaining emotionally true to the family he first brought to screen in 2005.

Script Written After Keaton’s Death

According to Mulroney, Bezucha “re‑approached” the sequel’s storyline after Keaton’s death and moved quickly to complete a draft. The actor told TV Insider and Parade that he has read the script, describing it as “brilliant” and emotionally deep, particularly in light of the cast and crew’s shared grief over losing Keaton.

Bezucha has previously said he would only proceed with a sequel if the core ensemble was genuinely interested in returning, drawing a comparison to a family reunion by remarking that he was “not interested in the Brady family reunion without the original Jan.” In late 2025 interviews, he noted that when he floated the idea to key cast members, the responses were unanimously positive, though he also acknowledged that the project had not yet been officially greenlit at that time.

No Release Date or Official Greenlight Yet

Despite the new details about the title and returning cast, outlets stress that The Families Stone does not yet have a release date. TV Insider notes that, as of late May 2026, no premiere window has been announced, and the project remains at the development stage.

Earlier coverage from late 2025 similarly reported that the sequel had not been formally greenlit by a studio, even as Bezucha worked on the script and held conversations with cast members about their potential involvement. Parade’s January 2026 explainer also emphasized that no trailer or production timeline exists yet, underscoring how early the process still is in industry terms.

The Original Film’s Enduring Appeal

The Family Stone, released in 2005, blended comedy and drama to follow the Stone family during a Christmas gathering where Everett brings his nervous partner Meredith home to meet his parents and siblings. The film’s story explores themes of grief, class, communication, and acceptance, including the family’s support for a deaf gay son and his partner, elements that contributed to its resonance with many LGBTQ+ viewers and families who saw their experiences reflected on screen.

Over the years, the movie has developed a reputation as a modern holiday staple, frequently re‑appearing on seasonal watch lists and streaming platforms. Writers and commentators have described it as an underrated entry in the holiday canon, noting that its portrayal of a messy, loving family—with queer and disabled representation woven into the narrative—feels more nuanced than many contemporary holiday movies.

Sarah Jessica Parker and Others Reflect

Sarah Jessica Parker has previously spoken about the sequel discussions, calling the project exciting but “bittersweet” given Keaton’s death. In January 2026, she told Variety that there had already been conversations with the ensemble before Keaton’s passing and that she hoped the group would ultimately be able to reunite.

Mulroney, for his part, has described Keaton as profoundly impactful in her role as Sybil, both on screen and in the lives of the cast, referring to the original film as “life‑altering.” He has also teased that the new script reveals “how went down the last 20 years for the Stones,” suggesting a narrative that tracks how the family has grown, grieved, and reconfigured itself since the events of the first movie, though no official plot synopsis has been released.

Representation, Family, and What Comes Next

While new interviews have not yet detailed how the sequel will approach the Stone family’s queer and disabled characters, Bezucha’s earlier comments about “honoring” Keaton and the ensemble suggest a continued focus on the relationships that made the original resonate with diverse audiences. Entertainment coverage has highlighted that keeping the core cast intact has been a priority, which may increase the likelihood that existing character arcs—including LGBTQ+ and disability storylines—receive thoughtful continuation rather than being sidelined.

For now, The Families Stone remains an actively developing project rather than a dated release on a studio calendar, but the combination of a completed script, enthusiastic cast, and sustained audience affection for the original film has given the sequel significant momentum. As more details emerge, fans of the Stone family—including LGBTQ+ viewers who saw aspects of their own families reflected in the 2005 story—will be watching closely to see how this new chapter balances nostalgia, loss, and the evolving realities of chosen and biological families on screen.

Pattie Gonia Says Patagonia Is Trying to “Bully” and “Erase” Her as Trademark Fight Goes Public

Photo Credit: Pattie Gonia / Instagram

by Chris Tremblay May 28

11 MIN READ

Patagonia, the California‑based outdoor clothing and gear company founded in 1973, filed a federal trademark infringement lawsuit in January 2026 against drag performer and environmental activist Pattie Gonia, whose legal name is Wyn Wiley, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The case, filed on January 21 and captioned Patagonia Inc. v. Pattie Gonia Productions, targets Wiley and Entrepreneur Enterprises dba Pattie Gonia Productions over use of the “Pattie Gonia” name on apparel, events, and advocacy‑related services.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Pattie Gonia (@pattiegonia)

Patagonia argues that the “Pattie Gonia” mark, a phonetic play on “Patagonia,” has been used in ways that directly overlap with the company’s own commercial activities, including apparel sales and environmental advocacy, creating what it calls a likelihood of consumer confusion regarding affiliation, sponsorship, or endorsement. The complaint notes that Wiley sought federal registration of “PATTIE GONIA” in September 2025 for a broad range of goods and services, from clothing and online marketing to promoting public awareness of environmental sustainability and LGBTQIA2S+ equality, mirroring areas Patagonia says are core to its business and mission.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Pattie Gonia (@pattiegonia)

The lawsuit and Patagonia’s position

In its public statement titled “Protecting Our Brand: Update on Trademark Activity,” Patagonia says it “reluctantly” filed the lawsuit to defend trademarks it has developed over more than 50 years, arguing that failing to act against “near copies” of its name could dilute the brand and undermine its environmental advocacy work. The company asserts that the “Pattie Gonia” brand, which appears on outdoor‑themed merchandise and in connection with climate‑focused events, “poses long‑term threats to Patagonia’s brand and our activism” because consumers might wrongly assume corporate backing.

Court filings and coverage indicate Patagonia is seeking what it describes as “only nominal monetary damages” in the amount of $1, along with attorneys’ fees and, most significantly, an injunction prohibiting Wiley from using “Pattie Gonia” as a registered trademark in ways that infringe or dilute Patagonia’s marks. The company maintains that money alone cannot remedy the alleged harm, telling the court that the damage to its reputation and distinctiveness is “irreparable” and that an injunction is the only adequate solution.

The complaint references a prior 2022 agreement, under which Wiley allegedly promised to limit use of the “Pattie Gonia” name as a brand and avoid incorporating Patagonia’s logo or distinctive trade dress, a commitment Patagonia says was later violated when Wiley resumed selling merchandise and sought trademark protection. Coverage of the legal filings reports that Patagonia claims Wiley’s merchandise at times included stylized designs, such as “Pattie Gonia Hiking Club” graphics, that the company views as echoing its own visual branding.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Pattie Gonia (@pattiegonia)

Pattie Gonia breaks months of silence

For several months after the lawsuit was filed, Wiley did not issue an extensive public response, instead focusing on private efforts to resolve the dispute, according to later statements. That changed on May 27, when she posted a detailed video on YouTube and shared aligned statements on social media, describing the lawsuit as a fight that goes beyond trademarks and into the ability of a queer climate activist to continue using her name and platform.

“Today I’m speaking publicly for the first time about the lawsuit Patagonia Inc. filed against me, a climate activist, in federal court,” she wrote, framing the conflict as an asymmetrical battle between a “multi‑billion dollar corporation” and an individual creator who uses drag to advocate for environmental protection and LGBTQ+ rights. Wiley said she had remained quiet for four months while exploring settlement options, but ultimately faced a choice between relinquishing the “Pattie Gonia” name and the work built around it or contesting the case in public.

Claims of “bullying” and “erasure”

In her new statements, Wiley contends that Patagonia’s legal strategy is less about a brand clash and more about power, saying, “This is not a brand conflict. This is a corporation trying to erase an activist.” She accuses the company of using its substantial resources to “bully” a smaller opponent, asserting that Patagonia is seeking to permanently take away her performing and advocacy name through trademark restrictions that would extend far beyond any one product line.

Wiley also disputes Patagonia’s messaging that the lawsuit is financially minimal because it requests only $1 in damages, writing that “what they’re actually trying to do is take away my name permanently and threaten me with more than $1M in legal fees.” She says that facing more than a million dollars in potential attorneys’ fees could strip away not only her activism and income, but also the livelihoods of team members she employs, framing the financial risk as existential for her small operation.

Wiley emphasizes that she and her collaborators “never and will never reference the brand Patagonia’s logo or brand,” arguing that her work is distinct and that her drag persona has been built organically over years of community‑based activism and outdoor events. She further notes that Patagonia’s complaint explicitly lists activities such as “motivational speaking services in support of environmental sustainability” and “organizing, arranging, and conducting trail and hiking events” as infringing uses, contending that the company is effectively targeting the same climate‑focused, community‑oriented activities for which she is best known.

Legal counter‑moves and call to action

In newly filed court documents, Wiley’s legal team denies Patagonia’s allegations and requests a jury trial, asserting that there is “no likelihood of confusion” between the Patagonia trademarks and the “Pattie Gonia” moniker as used by a drag artist and activist. Her attorneys reportedly argue that one or more of Patagonia’s asserted marks may not meet the legal standards for being distinctive or famous to the extent claimed in the company’s dilution arguments.

Wiley’s public messaging now intertwines legal defense with community mobilization: she urges her followers — including an audience of about 1.7 million people on Instagram alone — to support her demand that Patagonia drop the lawsuit, while promising additional updates as the case evolves. In her video and posts, she calls on supporters to engage respectfully but firmly with the company and to view the dispute as part of a larger conversation about how corporations interact with queer activists and climate‑justice organizers.

Broader stakes for branding, activism, and LGBTQ+ visibility

The dispute unfolds at an intersection of trademark law, corporate social responsibility, and LGBTQ+ visibility in the outdoors, raising questions about how far established brands may go in policing perceived echoes of their names when those echoes belong to people using art and advocacy to address climate change. Commentators in legal and business circles note that while trademark owners are legally required to police their marks to avoid genericide and dilution, enforcement against marginalized activists can carry reputational risks and may appear inconsistent with stated commitments to inclusion and environmental justice.

Patagonia has long promoted a public image of environmental leadership, once declaring it was “in business to save our home planet,” and has engaged in high‑profile campaigns on conservation and climate policy, factors that now frame the optics of its conflict with a queer climate activist who also leads hikes and educational events. For LGBTQ+ people who have found visibility and community in outdoor spaces through Pattie Gonia’s work, the lawsuit raises concerns about whether legal mechanisms designed to safeguard intellectual property might inadvertently narrow the space for queer and trans environmental advocacy.

As of late May 2026, the case remains active, with Patagonia reiterating that it is primarily focused on protecting its trademark and Wiley vowing to defend her ability to use the Pattie Gonia name in court and in public life. No trial date has yet been reported, and both sides face mounting legal and reputational stakes as supporters, customers, and legal observers watch to see how the clash between a global outdoor brand and a queer climate activist will play out in court and in public opinion.